The Rate of Retreatment in Patients treated with teprotumumab: A Multicenter Study of 119 Patients with 1 year Follow Up

Shoaib Ugradar,Emanuil Parunakian,Emil Malkhasyan,Carolina A. Chiou,Hannah L. Walsh,Joseph Tolentino,Sara T. Wester,Suzanne K. Freitag,Raymond Douglas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.07.018
IF: 14.277
2024-07-20
Ophthalmology
Abstract:Objective or Purpose To determine the rate of retreatment in patients who receive a full course of teprotumumab therapy for Thyroid Eye Disease (TED) and drivers of retreatment. Design Multi center, retrospective study Subjects All patients who received a full course of treatment and had available data at 1 year post initial treatment were included. Methods Charts were reviewed for the following information: age, gender, months since diagnosis of TED, smoking status, prior treatments. Further, the clinical activity score (CAS), proptosis and the Gorman diplopia score were reviewed at baseline, at the end of the first course and at baseline for the second course in those who received it. A logistic regression model was created to review the drivers of retreatment. Main Outcome Measures Rate of retreatment and the drivers of retreatment. Results 119 patients were included from 3 centers across the US. The overall retreatment rate was 24% (29/119). There was no difference between the 3 sites (p = 0.6). In univariate analyses, at baseline, there was no difference in proptosis (p = 0.07), diplopia score (p = 0.4) or duration of TED (p = 0.4), between retreated and non-retreated patients. From the retreated group, 82% had a significant proptosis response (≥ 2 mms reduction from baseline) following their initial course, while 68% of patients had a clinically significant proptosis response in the non-retreated group (p = 0.16). The use of other treatments prior to the first infusion of teprotumumab and baseline thyroid dysfunction, were not significantly different between the retreated and non-retreated groups (p = 0.06 and 0.09, respectively). The mean (SD) difference between the end of first treatment and at baseline prior to second treatment (in those who received it) was 2 (2) for CAS, 2 mms (4) for proptosis and 1 (1) for diplopia. Age as the only significant driver of retreatment (p < 0.05). Retreated patients were 7 years older than their non retreated counterparts (age 60 vs 53 (p < 0.05). Conclusions In patients receiving a full course of teprotumumab therapy, the rate of retreatment is 24%. Age is the only driver of retreatment.
ophthalmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?