Consecutive Case Series of Uniportal Full‐endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Relationship between Decompression Range and Functional Outcomes

Haining Tan,Lingjia Yu,Xuehu Xie,Ning Liu,Guoqiang Zhang,Xiang Li,Yong Yang,Bin Zhu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13928
2023-10-20
Orthopaedic Surgery
Abstract:Uniportal full‐endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (UFE‐ULBD) using an interlaminar approach can provide satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes in single‐segment treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients. With sufficient exposure of the dural sac boundary, the functional outcome was not related to the radiological decompression range in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who had undergone UFE‐ULBD. Objective Uniportal full‐endoscopic unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (UFE‐ULBD) has been used to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with satisfactory outcomes. However, a limited number of studies have investigated the relationship between decompression range and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of UFE‐ULBD for single‐segment LSS and to explore the relationship between the decompression range and functional outcomes. Methods Single‐segment LSS patients who had undergone UFE‐ULBD using an interlaminar approach between November 2021 and February 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for leg and back pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, modified MacNab grades, and radiological outcomes, including the decompression ratio of the disc‐flava ligament space and osseous lateral recess, the enlargement ratio of superior articular process interval, lamina interval dural sac cross‐sectional area (DSCA), were collected. The independent sample t‐tests, paired sample t‐tests, chi‐square tests, Fisher's exact tests, and Pearson's and Spearman's correlation analyses were used. Results Forty patients (23 males, and 17 females) were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The mean follow‐up period was 12 months. At the last follow‐up, VAS scores for leg pain and back pain decreased from 6.0 ± 0.8 to 1.0 ± 1.9 (p
orthopedics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?