Abstract:BackgroundMany different preventatives have showed efficacy in the treatment of migraine. National guidelines differ in their recommendations and patients’ characteristics are usually taken into account in their selection. In Spain, real life use of preventive therapies seems to be heterogeneous. We aimed to evaluate differences in clinical practice and adherence to national guidelines among Spanish neurologists.MethodsObservational descriptive study. A survey was conducted among neurologists ascribed to the Spanish Society of Neurology. Participants were differentiated in accordance with their dedication to headache disorders. We analysed socio-demographic parameters and evaluated 43 questions considering migraine management as well as therapeutic choices regarding migraine sub-types and finally, neurologists’ personal perception.ResultsOne hundred fifty-five neurologists participated from 17 different regions, 43.4% of them female and 53.3% under 40 years of age. 34.9% confirmed headache disorders as their main interest.The first choice for preventive therapy in chronic migraine among participants was topiramate (57%) followed by amytriptiline (17.9%) and beta-blockers (14.6%). However in episodic migraine, the preferred options were beta-blockers (47.7%), topiramate (21.5%) and amytriptiline (13.4%). Regarding perceived efficacy, topiramate was considered the best option in chronic migraine (42.7%) followed by onabotulinumtoxinA (25.5%) and amitryptiline (22.4%). Where episodic migraine was concerned, surveyed neurologists perceived topiramate (43.7%) and beta-blockers (30.3%) as the best options. When we evaluated the duration of treatment use with a view to adequate therapeutic response, 43.5% of neurologists preferred 3 months duration and 39.5% were in favour of 6 months duration in episodic migraine. However, considering the preferred duration of treatment use in chronic migraine, 20.4% recommended 3 months, 42.1% preferred 6 months and 12.5% and 22.4% opted for 9 and 12 months respectively. When considering onabotulinumtoxinA therapy, the number of prior therapeutic failures was zero in 7.2% of neurologists, one in 5.9%, two in 44.1%, three in 30.9% and four or more in 11.9%. Following an initial treatment failure with onabotulinumtoxinA, 49% of subjects decided against a second treatment. The number of OnabotA procedures before considering it as ineffective was two in 18.9% of neurologists, three in 70.8% and four in 10.4%.ConclusionsThe initial management of migraine among Spanish Neurologists is in line with most guidelines, where first choice preventative drugs are concerned. The Management of episodic migraine differed from chronic migraine, both in terms of neurologist preference and in their perceived efficacy.

Preventive and abortive treatment of migraine with traditional drugs. The state of the art

Migraine: Pathophysiology, Pharmacology, Treatment and Future Trends

The pathophysiological and pharmacological basis of current drug treatment of migraine headache

Real world preventative drug management of migraine among Spanish neurologists

Intervening in the Premonitory Phase to Prevent Migraine: Prospects for Pharmacotherapy

Migraine Treatment: When, Why, and How to Introduce Antimigraine Therapies

Advances in Pharmaceutic Managements of Migraine

Side effects associated with current and prospective antimigraine pharmacotherapies

Novel strategies for the treatment of migraine attacks via the CGRP, serotonin, dopamine, PAC1, and NMDA receptors

New Oral Drugs for Migraine

Migraine Treatment: Towards New Pharmacological Targets

Evaluating Modern Therapeutic Interventions for Migraine Management: A Systematic Review

Emerging drugs for the preventive treatment of migraine: a review of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants trials

An update on migraine

Pharmacological management of migraine: current strategies and future directions

The Role of the Combination Paracetamol/Caffeine in Treatment of Acute Migraine Pain: A Narrative Review

Acute treatment of migraine headaches

Migraine Management in Medically Complex Patients: a Narrative Review

Drug-related side effects and adverse reactions in the treatment of migraine: a bibliometric and visual analysis

New migraine drugs: A critical appraisal of the reason why the majority of migraine patients do not receive an adequate medication

New Developments in the Prophylactic Drug Treatment of Pediatric Migraine: What Is New in 2017 and Where Does It Leave Us?