Abstract:Software forges like GitHub host millions of repositories. Software engineering researchers have been able to take advantage of such a large corpora of potential study subjects with the help of tools like GHTorrent and Boa. However, the simplicity in querying comes with a caveat: there are limited means of separating the signal (e.g. repositories containing engineered software projects) from the noise (e.g. repositories containing home work assignments). The proportion of noise in a random sample of repositories could skew the study and may lead to researchers reaching unrealistic, potentially inaccurate, conclusions. We argue that it is imperative to have the ability to sieve out the noise in such large repository forges. We propose a framework, and present a reference implementation of the framework as a tool called reaper, to enable researchers to select GitHub repositories that contain evidence of an engineered software project. We identify software engineering practices (called dimensions) and propose means for validating their existence in a GitHub repository. We used reaper to measure the dimensions of 1,857,423 GitHub repositories. We then used manually classified data sets of repositories to train classifiers capable of predicting if a given GitHub repository contains an engineered software project. The performance of the classifiers was evaluated using a set of 200 repositories with known ground truth classification. We also compared the performance of the classifiers to other approaches to classification (e.g. number of GitHub Stargazers) and found our classifiers to outperform existing approaches. We found stargazers-based classifier (with 10 as the threshold for number of stargazers) to exhibit high precision (97%) but an inversely proportional recall (32%). On the other hand, our best classifier exhibited a high precision (82%) and a high recall (86%). The stargazer-based criteria offers precision but fails to recall a significant portion of the population.

Machine learning model for identification of frontend and backend repositories in Github

Detecting Similar Repositories On Github

Identifying Unmaintained Projects in GitHub

A Large Scale Study of Long-Time Contributor Prediction for GitHub Projects

Estimating defectiveness of source code: A predictive model using GitHub content

Curating GitHub for engineered software projects

GEMiner: Mining Social and Programming Behaviors to Identify Experts in Github

Detecting Malicious Accounts in Online Developer Communities Using Deep Learning

Malicious Repositories Detection with Adversarial Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Learning

Empirical Study on the Software Engineering Practices in Open Source ML Package Repositories

"Paper, Meet Code": A Deep Learning Approach to Linking Scholarly Articles With GitHub Repositories

RepoFusion: Training Code Models to Understand Your Repository

Automatic Detection of Public Development Projects in Large Open Source Ecosystems: an Exploratory Study on GitHub

Automatically Deriving Developers’ Technical Expertise from the GitHub Social Network

Categorizing the Content of GitHub README Files

Anomalicious: Automated Detection of Anomalous and Potentially Malicious Commits on GitHub

Automated Extraction and Maturity Analysis of Open Source Clinical Informatics Repositories from Scientific Literature

Software Repositories and Machine Learning Research in Cyber Security

Identifying collaborators in large codebases

On the effectiveness of Large Language Models for GitHub Workflows

How to Understand Whole Software Repository?