Lessons learnt from a nationally funded training and mentoring programme for early‐mid career musculoskeletal researchers in Australia

Belinda J. Lawford,Rana S. Hinman,Kim L. Bennell,David J. Hunter,Paul W. Hodges,Jenny Setchell,Jillian Eyles,Kim Allison,Penny Campbell,Rebecca Mellor,MUSQ:Impact Steering Committee,B. Vicenzino
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1820
2023-10-17
Musculoskeletal Care
Abstract:Introduction Quality training and mentoring are crucial components of successful career development for early mid career researchers (EMCRs). This paper describes the overarching framework of novel ongoing national Training and Mentoring Programme Melbourne University Sydney Queensland:Impact (MUSQ:Impact) for musculoskeletal researchers, including a description of how it was set up and established, and lessons learned from its implementation. Results The MUSQ:Impact programme spans four multidisciplinary musculoskeletal research teams across three universities in Australia, comprising 40–60 EMCR members. It was established to provide EMCRs with a unique learning environment and opportunities to gain exposure to, and network with, other national musculoskeletal research teams. Specific goals are to focus on core research competencies (e.g. writing skills, managing grant budgets, public speaking and media engagement, research translation), provide career mentoring, fund development activities (e.g. conference attendance, laboratory visits, skill development courses), and share training resources (e.g. data dictionaries, project summaries). A Steering Committee of 10–12 EMCR members, co‐chaired by a senior researcher and one EMCR, is responsible for overseeing MUSQ:Impact and organising regular activities, including a monthly webinar series, a mentor/mentee scheme, annual group research retreats, annual infographic competition, and funding awards. An evaluation survey found that most participants perceived each activity to be beneficial and of value to their research career and development. Conclusion This paper presents the structure of national training and mentoring programme that serves as a potential template for other research teams to adapt within their own contexts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?