Abstract:Background The likelihood of undergoing reoperative coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) is important for older patients who are considering first‐time CABG. Trends in the reoperative CABG for these patients are unknown. Methods and Results We used the Medicare fee‐for‐service inpatient claims data of adults undergoing isolated first‐time CABG between 1998 and 2017. The primary outcome was time to first reoperative CABG within 5 years of discharge from the index surgery, treating death as a competing risk. We fitted a Cox regression to model the likelihood of reoperative CABG as a function of patient baseline characteristics. There were 1 666 875 unique patients undergoing first‐time isolated CABG and surviving to hospital discharge. The median (interquartile range) age of patients did not change significantly over time (from 74 [69–78] in 1998 to 73 [69–78] in 2017); the proportion of women decreased from 34.8% to 26.1%. The 5‐year rate of reoperative CABG declined from 0.77% (95% CI, 0.72%–0.82%) in 1998 to 0.23% (95% CI, 0.19%–0.28%) in 2013. The annual proportional decline in the 5‐year rate of reoperative CABG overall was 6.6% (95% CI, 6.0%–7.1%) nationwide, which did not differ across subgroups, except the non‐white non‐black race group that had an annual decline of 8.5% (95% CI, 6.2%–10.7%). Conclusions Over a recent 20‐year period, the Medicare fee‐for‐service patients experienced a significant decline in the rate of reoperative CABG. In this cohort of older adults, the rate of declining differed across demographic subgroups. Nonstandard Abbreviations and Acronyms CABG coronary artery bypass graft CMS Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services FFS fee‐for‐service PCI percutaneous coronary intervention Clinical Perspective What Is New? We characterized the contemporary rate of reoperative coronary artery bypass graft surgery within 5 years after the first‐time coronary artery bypass graft surgery and its trend over a 20‐year period. What Are The Clinical Implications? Older adult patients undergoing first‐time coronary artery bypass graft surgery can expect that the likelihood of having to undergo reoperative coronary artery bypass graft surgery is extremely low, with a 5‐year rate of 0.2%. Survival after coronary revascularization procedures has steadily improved over time despite increasing patient complexity, 1 , 2 , 3 but the long‐term rate of reoperative coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and how it has changed over time remain unknown. Characterizing the rate of reoperative CABG after initial revascularization is important from a patient perspective, because CABG is associated with a long recovery time and the majority of patients prefer percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over CABG, even in a hypothetical scenario where PCI is associated with higher risks of death and repeat revascularization. 4 , 5 Therefore, information regarding the chance of undergoing reoperative CABG should be part of shared‐decision making. 6 However, evolution of this important outcome has only been characterized in a voluntary registry 7 or within trial data. 8 The role of reoperative CABG is limited to select situations, including when the disease is not amenable to PCI or in patients with an occluded internal mammary artery graft to the left anterior descending artery. 9 Reoperative CABG is also recommended when there is an indication that patients with significant coronary disease require another open‐heart operation. Patient populations with indications for reoperative CABG have likely changed substantially, because techniques for PCI have improved and transcatheter appr -Abstract Truncated-

Minimally Invasive CABG Is The Future: Pro

Recent Advances in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Techniques and Outcomes: A Narrative Review

Step-by-step technique of robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass

Minimally-invasive video-assisted coronary-artery bypass grafting

Experiences and lessons of minimally invasive single coronary artery bypass grafting——505 cases report in asingle institute

Sixteen Years of Single-Center Experience

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for left anterior descending artery revascularization - analysis of 300 cases.

A clinical study of minimally invasive left chest incision coronary artery bypass surgery

Is minimally invasive multi-vessel off-pump coronary surgery as safe and effective as MIDCAB?

Operative Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease

Comparing the Effectiveness of Open and Minimally Invasive Approaches in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review

Short- and Long-Term Results for Single and Multi-Vessel Disease

Techniques and Results of Multiple Arterial Bypass Grafting: Towards More "Curative" Coronary Revascularizations

Minimally invasive strategies of surgical coronary artery revascularization for the aging population

[Clinical experience of minimal invasive coronary surgery-coronary artery bypass grafting: a series of 244 cases]

Early and late outcomes after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass vs. full sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in the Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Era

Trends in Reoperative Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery for Older Adults in the United States, 1998 to 2017.

Is Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery Still Preferable to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) in View of Long-Term Outcomes among Diabetic Patients?

Small incisions still require great anesthesia: anesthesiology techniques to enhance recovery in robotic coronary bypass grafting

Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Coronary Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease