An integrated dynamic biological supply chain management with three layers under logistic strategies

Biswajit Sarkar,Nandadulal Bairagi,Santanu Bhattacharya
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2024.110387
IF: 7.18
2024-07-25
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Abstract:This work combines the issues of a time-varying biological system with the supply chain management under one umbrella of the "dynamic biological supply chain management". The bioeconomic model is first analyzed from the dynamic perspective to obtain stable biomass of two biological species. A portion of the essential nutrition for one species is replenished in combined fish–broiler farming by recycling solid waste generated by the other species. In the second step, a single-setup-multi-delivery (SSMD) enabled supply chain management, consisting of a single supplier, a single manufacturer, and multi-retailer, is defined. After receiving the baby fishes and broilers from the supplier, the manufacturer uses integrated farming to generate big fishes and broilers from the baby fishes and broilers. The manufacturer then supplies them to different retailers as per their demands, and the retailers sell these products. The supply chain management is analyzed at the equilibrium of the biomass level for two bioproducts to minimize the production, holding, and supply costs related to the inventory of those bioproducts. This study employs two distinct approaches for parameter sensitivity analysis to identify the most influential parameter in a methodologically justified manner. The first approach is the classical one-factor-at-a-time analysis, and the second is the Plackett–Burman screening design. The outcomes of both sensitivity analyses for system parameters consistently indicate that the demand parameter holds the highest sensitivity. However, material cost is the most sensitive parameter among all cost parameters, and the environmental carrying capacity is the most sensitive among all biological parameters. A cost–benefit analysis indicates that the single-setup-multi-delivery policy outperforms the single-setup-single-delivery strategy in terms of cost-effectiveness when the retailers' holding cost exceeds the maximum of the supplier and manufacturer holding costs, even when the former incurs higher carbon emission costs. Conversely, the single-setup-single-delivery policy prevails when the retailer's holding cost is lower than the supplier's and manufacturer's minimum holding costs. This type of joint research has never been done before and may find a wide range of applications.
computer science, interdisciplinary applications,engineering, industrial
What problem does this paper attempt to address?