Abstract:Study objective In labor, programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) can be defined as the bolus administration of epidural solution at scheduled time intervals. Compared to continuous epidural infusion (CEI) with or without patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), PIEB has been associated with decreased pain scores and need for rescue analgesia and increased maternal satisfaction. The optimal volume and dosing interval of PIEB, however, has still not been determined. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022362708). Settings Labor. Patients Pregnant patients. Interventions Central, CINAHL, Global Health, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline and Web of Science were searched for randomized controlled trials that examined pregnant patients in labor who received CEI or PIEB with or without a PCEA component. Network meta-analysis was performed with a frequentist method, facilitating the indirect comparison of PIEB with different volumes and dosing intervals through the common comparator of CEI and substituting or supplementing direct comparisons with these indirect ones. Continuous and dichotomous outcomes were presented as mean differences and odds ratios, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias 2 tool. Main results Overall, 30 trials were included. For the first primary endpoint, need for rescue analgesia, PIEB delivered at a volume of 4 ml and frequency of 45 min (4/45) was inferior to PIEB 8/45 (OR 3.55; 95% CI 1.12–11.33), PIEB 10/60 was superior to PIEB 2.5/15 (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.16–0.82), PIEB 4/45 (OR 0.14; 95% CI 0.03–0.71) and PIEB 5/60 (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.08–0.70), and PIEB 5/30 was not inferior to PIEB 10/60 (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.31–1.19). For the second primary endpoint, maternal satisfaction, no differences were present between the various PIEB regimens. The quality of evidence for these multiple primary endpoints was low owing to the presence of serious limitations and imprecision. Importantly, PIEB 5/30 decreased the pain score at 4 h compared to PIEB 2.5/15 (MD 2.45; 95% CI 0.13–4.76), PIEB 5/60 (MD -2.28; 95% CI -4.18–-0.38) and PIEB 10/60 (MD 1.73; 95% CI 0.31–3.16). Mean ranking of interventions demonstrated PIEB 10/60 followed by PIEB 5/30 to be best placed to reduce the cumulative dose of local anesthetic, and this resulted in an improved incidence of lower limb motor blockade for PIEB 10/60 in comparison to CEI (OR 0.30; 95% CI 0.14–0.67). No differences in neonatal outcomes were found. Some concerns were present for the risk of bias in two thirds of trials and the risk of bias was shown to be high in the remaining one third of trials. Conclusions Future research should focus on PIEB 5/30 and PIEB 10/60 and how the method of analgesia initiation, nature and concentration of local anesthetic, design of epidural catheter and rate of administration might influence outcomes related to the mother and neonate.

Effect of dural puncture epidural technique combined with programmed intermittent epidural bolus on labor analgesia: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled clinical trial

Comparison of Dural Puncture Epidural, Epidural and Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Application of ropivacaine for combined spinal-epidural labor analgesia

Comparison of the dural puncture epidural and the standard epidural techniques in patients having labor analgesia maintained using programmed epidural boluses: a prospective double-blinded randomized clinical trial

Randomized Assessment of the Optimal Time Interval Between Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses When Combined With the Dural Puncture Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia

Determination of the Optimal Volume of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus When Combined With the Dural Puncture Epidural Technique for Labor Analgesia: A Random-Allocation Graded Dose-Response Study

Comparative Study of Labour Analgesia Onset with Injection of Loading Dose Through Epidural Needle Versus Catheter

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Programmed Intermittent Bolus and Continuous Infusion as the Background Infusion for Parturient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia

Efficacy of intermittent epidural bolus for patient-controlled epidural analgesia during delivery

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus in maintenance of epidural labor analgesia: a literature review

Optimum programmed intermittent epidural bolus interval time of ropivacaine 0.0625% with dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg/ml at a fixed volume of 10 mL: a randomized controlled trial

Influence of different volumes and frequency of programmed intermittent epidural bolus in labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

90% effective volume of 0.1% ropivacaine combined with 0.4 μg/ml sufentanil for epidural labour analgesia with push pump at a rate of 400 mL/hr and a bolus interval of 30 min: a double-blind sequential dose-finding study

A randomized double-blinded study assessing the dose-response of ropivacaine with dexmedetomidine for maintenance of labor with epidural analgesia in nulliparous parturients

Effects of labor analgesia on maternal and neonatal outcome by epidural low concentration of bupivacaine combined with anisodamine

The comparison of intermittent epidural bolus and continuous epidural infusion mode on labor analgesia

Quality of Labor Analgesia With Dural Puncture Epidural Versus Standard Epidural Technique in Obese Parturients: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Study

Role of lumbar puncture level on the onset of epidural labor analgesia: a randomized controlled trial

Combined spinal‐epidural vs. dural puncture epidural techniques for labour analgesia: a randomised controlled trial*

High Dosage of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) with Low Background Infusion During Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of different neuraxial analgesia modalities on the need for physician interventions in labour