Morbidity induced by the infiltration of foreign substances into the buttocks: A systematic review

Guillermo Ramos-Gallardo,Jesús Cuenca-Pardo,Lázaro Cárdenas-Camarena,Ana Luz Sánchez-Cervantes,Omar Jesús González-Castañeda

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.01.047

IF: 3.022

2024-02-03

Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery

Abstract:The infiltration of substances into the buttocks for aesthetic purposes can cause local or systemic damage; the substances that infiltrate are known as adjuvants, foreign substances, and polymers, and the available evidence is insufficient and frequently controversial. To identify the systemic complications associated with substances locally infiltrated in the buttocks for treatment, we carried out a systematic review according to the PRISMA criteria. We found 275 publications, 29 of which met the eligibility criteria: 3 from systematic reviews, 6 from case series and 20 from case reports. The number of cases was 463; 87% were women, with an average age of 39.94 years. The average time between infiltrations was 7.65 years. The substances infiltrated were silicone, oils, methyl methacrylate, guaiacol, sodium gadolinium, collagen, paraffin and other unknown substances. The complications were in 3 categories: local, systemic with inflammatory-immune response and renal damage due to hypercalcemia induced by the granulomatosis caused by the substance. There was no uniformity in the treatment of the patients, and the treatment was mainly focused on the main effect. Most of the patients treated surgically for resection of the affected tissue experienced local and systemic improvement (renal, hypercalcemia or inflammatory-immune). Patients who received comprehensive treatment based on inflammatory-immune control, control of renal involvement and resection of the tissue area that contained large amounts of the infiltrated substance had a better prognosis than those with diffuse infiltration and delayed treatment.

surgery