Abstract:Numerous studies have found that the Bayesian framework, which formulates the optimal integration of the knowledge of the world (i.e. prior) and current sensory evidence (i.e. likelihood), captures human behaviours sufficiently well. However, there are debates regarding whether humans use precise but cognitively demanding Bayesian computations for behaviours. Across two studies, we trained participants to estimate hidden locations of a target drawn from priors with different levels of uncertainty. In each trial, scattered dots provided noisy likelihood information about the target location. Participants showed that they learned the priors and combined prior and likelihood information to infer target locations in a Bayes fashion. We then introduced a transfer condition presenting a trained prior and a likelihood that has never been put together during training. How well participants integrate this novel likelihood with their learned prior is an indicator of whether participants perform Bayesian computations. In one study, participants experienced the newly introduced likelihood, which was paired with a different prior, during training. Participants changed likelihood weighting following expected directions although the degrees of change were significantly lower than Bayes-optimal predictions. In another group, the novel likelihoods were never used during training. We found people integrated a new likelihood within (interpolation) better than the one outside (extrapolation) the range of their previous learning experience and they were quantitatively Bayes-suboptimal in both. We replicated the findings of both studies in a validation dataset. Our results showed that Bayesian behaviours may not always be achieved by a full Bayesian computation. Future studies can apply our approach to different tasks to enhance the understanding of decision-making mechanisms. Bayesian decision theory has emerged as a unified approach for capturing a wide range of behaviours under uncertainty. However, behavioural evidence supporting that humans use explicit Bayesian computation is scarce. While it has been argued that knowledge generalization should be treated as hard evidence of the use of Bayesian strategies, results from previous work were inconclusive. Here, we develop a marker that effectively quantifies how well humans transfer learned priors to a new scenario. Our marker can be applied to various tasks and thus can provide a path forwarding the understanding of psychological and biological underpinnings of inferential behaviours.

Bayes in the Age of Intelligent Machines

Bayes in the age of intelligent machines

Knowledge-augmented face perception: Prospects for the Bayesian brain-framework to align AI and human vision

The "Bayesian" brain, with a bit less Bayes

Scientists Invent New Hypotheses, Do Brains?

Computational Neuropsychology and Bayesian Inference

Bayesian modeling of human–AI complementarity

World model learning and inference

Statistical Cognition Theory and Its Applications:An Overview

Computational Approaches to Access Probabilistic Population Codes for Higher Cognition an Decision-Making

Are we really Bayesian? Probabilistic inference shows sub-optimal knowledge transfer

Building Machines That Learn and Think Like People

Bayesian sense of time in biological and artificial brains

Bayesian cognitive science, predictive brains, and the nativism debate

Building Machines that Learn and Think with People

The principles of adaptation in organisms and machines II: Thermodynamics of the Bayesian brain

A Bayesian theory of mind approach to modeling cooperation and communication

Bayesian encoding and decoding as distinct perspectives on neural coding

Predictive and Interpretable: Combining Artificial Neural Networks and Classic Cognitive Models to Understand Human Learning and Decision Making

Neuroscience-Inspired Artificial Intelligence

Establishing a New Link between Fuzzy Logic, Neuroscience, and Quantum Mechanics through Bayesian Probability: Perspectives in Artificial Intelligence and Unconventional Computing