Centering Racial Health Equity in Systematic Reviews—Paper 1: Introduction to the Series
Meera Viswanathan,Nila Sathe,Vivian Welch,Damian Francis,Patricia Heyn,Rania Ali,Tiffany Duque,Elizabeth Terhune,Jennifer Lin,Ana Beatriz Pizzaro,Dru Riddle
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4696413
IF: 7.407
2024-10-30
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Abstract:Objective Systematic reviews hold immense promise as tools to highlight evidence-based practices that can reduce or aim to eliminate racial health disparities. Currently, consensus on centering racial health equity, in systematic reviews and other evidence synthesis products is lacking. Centering racial health equity implies concentrating or focusing attention on health equity in ways that bring attention to the perspectives or needs of groups that are typically marginalized. Study Design and Setting This Cochrane US Network team and colleagues, with the guidance of a steering committee, sought to understand the views of varied interest holders through semi-structured interviews, and conducted evidence syntheses addressing (1) definitions of racial health equity, (2) logic models and frameworks to center racial health equity, (3) interventions to reduce racial health inequities, and (4) interest holder engagement in evidence syntheses. Our methods and teams include a primarily American and Canadian lens; however, findings and insights derived from this work are applicable to any region in which racial or ethnic discrimination and disparities in care due to structural causes exist. Results In this series, we explain why centering racial health equity matters, what gaps exist and may need to be prioritized. The interviews and systematic reviews identified numerous gaps to address racial health equity that require changes not merely to evidence synthesis practices but also to the underlying evidence ecosystem. These changes include increasing representation, establishing foundational guidance (on definitions and causal mechanisms and models, building a substantive evidence base on racial health equity, strengthening methods guidance, disseminating and implementing results, and sustaining new practices). Conclusion Centering racial health equity requires consensus on the part of key interest holders. As part of the next steps in building consensus, the manifold gaps identified by this series of papers need to be prioritized. Given resource constraints, changes in norms around systematic reviews are most likely to occur when evidence-based standards for success are clearly established and the benefits of centering racial health equity are apparent.
public, environmental & occupational health,health care sciences & services