Abstract:Inherited and germ-line de novo copy number variants (CNVs) are increasingly found to be correlated with human developmental and cancerous phenotypes. Several models for template switching during replication have been proposed to explain the generation of these gross chromosomal rearrangements. We proposed a model of template switching (ODIRA—origin dependent inverted repeat amplification) in which simultaneous ligation of the leading and lagging strands at diverging replication forks could generate segmental inverted triplications through an extrachromosomal inverted circular intermediate. Here, we created a genetic assay using split- ura3 cassettes to trap the proposed inverted intermediate. However, instead of recovering circular inverted intermediates, we found inverted linear chromosomal fragments ending in native telomeres—suggesting that a template switch had occurred at the centromere-proximal fork of a replication bubble. As telomeric inverted hairpin fragments can also be created through double strand breaks we tested whether replication errors or repair of double stranded DNA breaks were the most likely initiating event. The results from CRISPR/Cas9 cleavage experiments and growth in the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea indicate that it is a replication error, not a double stranded break that creates the inverted junctions. Since inverted amplicons of the SUL1 gene occur during long-term growth in sulfate-limited chemostats, we sequenced evolved populations to look for evidence of linear intermediates formed by an error in replication. All of the data are compatible with a two-step version of the ODIRA model in which sequential template switching at short inverted repeats between the leading and lagging strands at a replication fork, followed by integration via homologous recombination, generates inverted interstitial triplications. Chromosomal rearrangements are a potent source of genetic variation in humans and other organisms. One specific type of rearrangement involves the increase in copies of segments of the genome. The variation in gene dosage that these rearrangements can cause has been associated with a wide range of neurological and other human disorders. A specific puzzling form of copy number increase consists of three tandem copies with the central copy in inverted orientation. How this rearrangement occurs is of great interest, yet the mechanisms responsible are only inferred by examining the sequence of final inverted products. Yeast provides a unique model system to explore the underlying molecular defects that give rise to inverted triplications. While the favored hypothesis suggests that double stranded DNA repair is the causative agent, we find that a particular form of template switching between strands at the replication fork, not a double stranded DNA break, is the initiating event. Using the awesome power of yeast genetics, we provide evidence in two different assays for this unique replication error that we call ODIRA (for Origin Dependent Inverted Repeat Amplification) and propose that it can also explain this form of copy number variant seen in human evolution and disease.

Break-induced replication underlies formation of inverted triplications and generates unexpected diversity in haplotype structures

Template switching between the leading and lagging strands at replication forks generates inverted copy number variants through hairpin-capped extrachromosomal DNA

A unifying model that explains the origins of human inverted copy number variants

Intrachromosomal Serial Replication Slippage Intransgives Rise to Diverse Genomic Rearrangements Involving Inversions

Mind the gap: the relevance of the genome reference to resolve rare and pathogenic inversions

Tandem and Inverted Duplications in Haemophilia A: Breakpoint Characterisation Provides Insight into Possible Rearrangement Mechanisms

RPA and Rad27 limit templated and inverted insertions at DNA breaks

Delineation of two multi-invasion-induced rearrangement pathways that differently affect genome stability

Replicative mechanisms of CNV formation preferentially occur as intrachromosomal events: evidence from Potocki-Lupski duplication syndrome.

Complex rearrangements in patients with duplications of MECP2 can occur by fork stalling and template switching.

Cytogenetically visible inversions are formed by multiple molecular mechanisms

The Dna Replication Fostes/Mmbir Mechanism Can Generate Genomic, Genic and Exonic Complex Rearrangements in Humans (reprinted from Nature Genetics, Vol 41, P 849-853, 2009)

Segmental Duplications and Copy-Number Variation in the Human Genome

Linear Interaction Between Replication and Transcription Shapes DNA Break Dynamics at Recurrent DNA Break Clusters

Isolation and molecular analysis of inv dup(15) and construction of a physical map of a common breakpoint in order to elucidate their mechanism of formation

Double complex mutations involving F8 and FUNDC2 caused by distinct break-induced replication.

invdup(8)(8q24.13q24.3)—A Complex Alteration and Its Clinical Consequences

Long Neural Genes Harbor Recurrent DNA Break Clusters in Neural Stem/Progenitor Cells

Efficient Cnv Breakpoint Analysis Reveals Unexpected Structural Complexity and Correlation of Dosage-Sensitive Genes with Clinical Severity in Genomic Disorders

Characterization of 26 Deletion CNVs Reveals the Frequent Occurrence of Micro-Mutations Within the Breakpoint-Flanking Regions and Frequent Repair of Double-Strand Breaks by Templated Insertions Derived from Remote Genomic Regions