Abstract:Rock-paper-scissors games metaphorically model cyclic dominance in ecology and microbiology. In a static environment, these models are characterized by fixation probabilities obeying two different "laws" in large and small well-mixed populations. Here, we investigate the evolution of these three-species models subject to a randomly switching carrying capacity modeling the endless change between states of resources scarcity and abundance. Focusing mainly on the zero-sum rock-paper-scissors game, equivalent to the cyclic Lotka-Volterra model, we study how the ${\it coupling}$ of demographic and environmental noise influences the fixation properties. More specifically, we investigate which species is the most likely to prevail in a population of fluctuating size and how the outcome depends on the environmental variability. We show that demographic noise coupled with environmental randomness "levels the field" of cyclic competition by balancing the effect of selection. In particular, we show that fast switching effectively reduces the selection intensity proportionally to the variance of the carrying capacity. We determine the conditions under which new fixation scenarios arise, where the most likely species to prevail changes with the rate of switching and the variance of the carrying capacity. Random switching has a limited effect on the mean fixation time that scales linearly with the average population size. Hence, environmental randomness makes the cyclic competition more egalitarian, but does not prolong the species coexistence. We also show how the fixation probabilities of close-to-zero-sum rock-paper-scissors games can be obtained from those of the zero-sum model by rescaling the selection intensity.

Repeated rock, paper, scissors play reveals limits in adaptive sequential behavior

Ancillary Mechanism for Autonomous Decision-Making Process in Asymmetric Confrontation: a View from Gomoku

Population-based Evaluation in Repeated Rock-Paper-Scissors as a Benchmark for Multiagent Reinforcement Learning

Adaptive rock-paper-scissors game enhances eco-evolutionary performance at cost of dynamic stability

Switching Costs in Frequently Repeated Games

Multi-AI competing and winning against humans in iterated Rock-Paper-Scissors game

Dynamics of Reliance on Algorithmic Advice

Acquisition of strategies depending on the opponents' competence level

On being unpredictable and winning.

What Drives People's Choices in Turn-Taking Games, if not Game-Theoretic Rationality?

Memory and limit cycles in rock-scissors-paper

Evolutionary consequences of behavioral diversity

Strong Stackelberg reasoning in symmetric games: An experimental replication and extension

Winning Without Observing Payoffs: Exploiting Behavioral Biases to Win Nearly Every Round

Autocratic strategies for alternating games

Oscillatory dynamics in evolutionary games are suppressed by heterogeneous adaptation rates of players

Strategic Play By Resource-Bounded Agents in Security Games

Fixation properties of rock-paper-scissors games in fluctuating populations

Clonal selection prevents tragedy of the commons when neighbors compete in a rock-paper-scissors game

Different Strokes in Randomised Strategies: Revisiting Kuhn's Theorem under Finite-Memory Assumptions

The dynamics of competition and decision-making