Thermo-economic analysis of an enhanced gekothermal system for power generation based on organic Rankine cycle

Yuan Zhao,Jun Gao,Yingxia Zheng,Bo Zhu,Guanqun Luo,Yuanjun Tang,Chao Ye
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctad097
IF: 2.3
2024-01-01
International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies
Abstract:Abstract The enhanced geothermal system (EGS) has been regarded as a promising means to exploit the abundant and low-carbon hot dry rock geothermal resources. In this work, two-stage EGSs with/without one-stage recuperative cycle for power generation based on organic Rankine cycle (ORC) were proposed, and their thermo-economic performance was evaluated, comparing to the one-stage EGS-ORC. The recuperative cycle improved the thermal performance of two-stage EGS and it had the highest thermal efficiency of 16.48%. Intermediate pressure and steam extraction ratio were important parameters that impacted the thermal performance of the two-stage EGS. The higher thermal efficiency was achieved at the intermediate pressure of 0.22 MPa and steam extraction ratio of 0.1. The two-stage EGS with one-stage recuperative cycle also had the lowest levelized cost of energy (LCOE) of $0.1895 kWh−1. According to the sensitivity analysis, the temperature of hot water and prices of electricity had the greatest impact on LCOE. The LCOE could be as low as $0.1704 kWh−1 if the temperature of hot water was 165.33 C. On the other hand, if the temperature of hot water was 149.58°C, the LCOE would be increased to $0.2179 kWh−1. The results from this study could provide the possible strategies to improve the overall thermo-economic performance of EGS-ORC.
energy & fuels,thermodynamics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to address the optimization of thermoeconomic performance in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) for power generation. Specifically, the study proposes two types of two-stage EGS systems based on the Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC): one with a single-stage regenerative cycle and the other without a regenerative cycle. The thermoeconomic performance of these two systems is evaluated and compared with a single-stage EGS-ORC system. ### Main Research Content: 1. **System Description**: - Two types of two-stage EGS systems are proposed: one with a single-stage regenerative cycle and the other without a regenerative cycle. - The system mainly consists of injection and production wells, two-stage turbines, heat exchangers, pumps, and condensers. - R245fa is used as the organic working fluid because it is non-toxic and has good global warming potential and ozone depletion potential. 2. **Thermodynamic Analysis**: - The system model was established using Aspen Plus software and simulated under steady-state assumptions. - The effects of intermediate pressure and steam extraction ratio on system thermal efficiency and power generation were studied. - The results show that the two-stage EGS system with a single-stage regenerative cycle has the highest thermal efficiency (16.48%), and the highest thermal efficiency is achieved when the intermediate pressure is 0.22 MPa and the steam extraction ratio is 0.1. 3. **Economic Analysis**: - The total investment cost, annual operation and maintenance cost, and power revenue of the system were calculated. - The economic feasibility of the system was evaluated by calculating the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE). - The results indicate that the two-stage EGS system with a single-stage regenerative cycle has the lowest LCOE, at $0.1895/kWh. 4. **Sensitivity Analysis**: - Sensitivity analysis was conducted on some key technical and economic parameters, including hot water temperature, electricity price, labor cost, steam extraction ratio, and intermediate pressure. - Hot water temperature and electricity price have the greatest impact on LCOE. When the hot water temperature increases from 149.58°C to 165.33°C, the LCOE decreases from $0.2179/kWh to $0.1704/kWh. ### Conclusion: - The two-stage EGS system with a single-stage regenerative cycle performs best in terms of thermoeconomic performance, with the highest thermal efficiency and the lowest LCOE. - Intermediate pressure and steam extraction ratio are important parameters affecting the thermal performance of the two-stage EGS system. - The total investment cost of the system accounts for more than 98% of the total investment, with underground investment (including geothermal well drilling and completion costs, resource exploration costs, and reservoir construction costs) accounting for 63%-64% of the total capital cost. - In the future, the overall performance of EGS can be further improved by increasing power generation capacity or co-producing power and heat. This study provides important guidance for the further development of ORC-based EGS power generation systems.