Abstract:Porsdam Mann and colleagues provide an overview of opportunities and risks associated with the use of personalized large language models (LLMs) for text production in bio)ethics (Porsdam Mann et al. Citation 2023 ). Although the authors consider a variety of relevant factors, we believe that some of the opportunities they list are being overvalued while some risks are not being taken seriously enough. We ground our criticism in our personal experience in academic work and our understanding of what should be at the core of ethical inquiry. In terms of ethical opportunities, Porsdam Mann and colleagues expect personalized LLMs to increase productivity and state that "[i]ncreased productivity in turn has numerous potential benefits, including increased rates of progress, innovation, and economic growth; and additional leisure time [...]" (Porsdam Mann et al. Citation 2023 , 35). Firstly, we argue that the introduction of such tools into bioethics will compromise, rather than enhance or facilitate, academic work. In a second step, we will question the connection between productivity and ethical innovation and progress that the authors suggest.

Why Personalized Large Language Models Fail to Do What Ethics is All About