Non-invasive prehabilitation to foster widespread fMRI cortical reorganization before brain tumor surgery: lessons from a case series
Leonardo Boccuni,Alba Roca-Ventura,Edgar Buloz-Osorio,David Leno-Colorado,Selma Delgado-Gallén,María Cabello-Toscano,Ruben Perellón-Alfonso,Gloria Villalba-Martínez,Francisco Martínez-Ricarte,Jesús Martín-Fernández,Mònica Buxeda-Rodriguez,Gerardo Conesa-Bertrán,Mireia Illueca-Moreno,Estela Lladó-Carbó,Cristóbal Perla Y Perla,César Garrido,José Carlos Pariente,Carlos Laredo,Emma Muñoz-Moreno,Núria Bargalló,Carlo Trompetto,Lucio Marinelli,David Bartrés-Faz,Kilian Abellaneda-Pérez,Alvaro Pascual-Leone,Josep María Tormos-Muñoz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04774-4
2024-07-23
Abstract:Purpose: The objective of this prospective, single-centre case series was to investigate feasibility, clinical outcomes, and neural correlates of non-invasive Neuromodulation-Induced Cortical Prehabilitation (NICP) before brain tumor surgery. Previous studies have shown that gross total resection is paramount to increase life expectancy but is counterbalanced by the need of preserving critical functional areas. NICP aims at expanding functional margins for extensive tumor resection without functional sequelae. Invasive NICP (intracranial neuromodulation) was effective but characterized by elevated costs and high rate of adverse events. Non-invasive NICP (transcranial neuromodulation) may represent a more feasible alternative. Nonetheless, up to this point, non-invasive NICP has been examined in only two case reports, yielding inconclusive findings. Methods: Treatment sessions consisted of non-invasive neuromodulation, to transiently deactivate critical areas adjacent to the lesion, coupled with intensive functional training, to activate alternative nodes within the same functional network. Patients were evaluated pre-NICP, post-NICP, and at follow-up post-surgery. Results: Ten patients performed the intervention. Feasibility criteria were met (retention, adherence, safety, and patient's satisfaction). Clinical outcomes showed overall stability and improvements in motor and executive function from pre- to post-NICP, and at follow-up. Relevant plasticity changes (increase in the distance between tumor and critical area) were observed when the neuromodulation target was guided by functional neuroimaging data. Conclusion: This is the first case series demonstrating feasibility of non-invasive NICP. Neural correlates indicate that neuroimaging-guided target selection may represent a valid strategy to leverage neuroplastic changes before neurosurgery. Further investigations are needed to confirm such preliminary findings.