Advanced modeling of compressive strength in silica-modified oil well cement: impact of silicate, aluminate, and hydraulic moduli
Mohammed Ariwan Jamal,Ahmed Salih Mohammed,Jagar A. Ali
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759.2024.2435530
2024-12-04
Nondestructive Testing And Evaluation
Abstract:This study explores the effect of cement chemical composition on the compressive strength (CS) of pure cement, cement modified with Nano Silica (NS), and Silica Fume (SF) across various mix proportions, curing times, and temperatures. Three new parameters, Silicate Modulus (SM), Aluminate Modulus (AM), and Hydraulic Modulus (HM), were introduced to evaluate cement composition's impact on CS. SM combines SiO2, Al2O3, and Fe2O3; AM integrates Al2O3 and Fe2O3; and HM includes CaO, SiO2, Al2O3, and Fe2O3. Using 355 datasets, two mathematical models, Cubic (CUB) and linear and inverse (L&I), predicted CS, considering factors like cement composition, water-to-binder ratio, NS and SF content, curing time, and temperature. Statistical tools such as R 2 , RMSE, MAE, and SI validated model accuracy. The study assessed three scenarios: (1) multi-variate analysis of individual cement oxides; (2) bi-variate analysis using SM and AM, and (3) mono-variate analysis using HM. Introducing SM, AM, and HM improved model accuracy and reduced input parameters. Optimal NS and SF replacement percentages were 4.64% and 14.6%, respectively. SM, AM, and HM optimal values were 2.62, 1.38, and 2.21. Although initial costs increase with these replacements, they offer long-term benefits and align with sustainable construction practices.
materials science, characterization & testing