Piloting a forced-choice task to elicit treatment preferences in geographic atrophy

Jamie Enoch,Arevik Ghulakhszian,Mandeep Sekhon,David P. Crabb,Deanna J. Taylor,Christiana Dinah
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06531-8
2023-10-02
BMC Research Notes
Abstract:Geographic Atrophy (GA) is the advanced form of the non-neovascular ('dry') type of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and responsible for one-quarter of legal blindness in the UK. New therapies delivered by intravitreal injection are in late-stage development, and two such therapies (pegcetacoplan (Syfovre) and avacincaptad pegol (Izervay)) have now been approved for clinical use by the US Food and Drug Administration. These therapies slow down, but do not stop or reverse, progression of GA and they may also increase the risk of developing the neovascular ('wet') type of AMD. Within a larger study exploring the acceptability of these new treatments to people living with GA, we developed a forced-choice exercise to evaluate how participants weigh up benefits and drawbacks of different treatment regimens. This research note reports quantitative and qualitative findings from this exercise.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?