(216) Benefit of Closed Wound Drainage System with Negative Pressure in Penile Enhancement Surgery

S Jang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae002.193

2024-03-06

The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract:Introduction Many patients have had penile enhancement surgery and the surgeon try to reduce postoperative complications including hemorrage, infection, wound dehiscence etc. we want to evaluate the benefits of closed wound drainage system with negative pressure in penile enhancement surgery. Objective we want to evaluate the benefits of closed wound drainage system with negative pressure in penile enhancement surgery. Methods We have experienced 500 penile enhancement surgery. We adopted a pre-pubic minimal incision and dissected penile shaft and pre-pubic space. Inserted graft materials were Allograft dermal grafts which were fixed at the Buck's fascia. And we dissected fundi-form ligaments and sutured transversely pre-pubic dead space with PDS 2.0. In group 1, silastic drain were inserted in 250cases in order to drain postoperative bleeding and prevent inflammation. In group 2, the remain 250 cases adopted closed wound drainage system with negative pressure. Results In group 1, the wound infecton rate was 2.9% and no dermal graft infection was showed. In group 2, the wound infection rate was 0.6% and no dermal graft infection was appeared. Group 1 using closed wound drainage system with negative pressure is more effective than group 2 using silastic drain in order to reduce wound infection rate. Conclusions In penile augmentation surgery using Allogenic dermis, Using closed wound drainage system with negative pressure is safer than using silastic drain as postoperative drainage system. Disclosure No.

urology & nephrology