Abstract:Abstract Regulating interest groups’ access to decision makers constitutes a key dimension of legitimate and accountable systems of government. The European Union explicitly links lobbying regulation with the democratic credentials of its supranational system of governance and proposes transparency as a solution to increase legitimacy and regulate private actors’ participation in policy making. This lobbying regulation regime consists of a Transparency Register that conditions access to decision makers upon joining it and complying with its information disclosure requirements. The extent to which transparency‐based regulatory regimes are successful in ensuring effective regulation of targeted actors and in being recognised as a legitimate instrument of governance constitutes a key empirical question. Therefore, the study asks: Do stakeholders perceive the transparency‐based EU lobbying regulation regime to be a legitimate form of regulatory governance? The study answers by building on a classic model of targeted transparency and proposes perceived regulatory effectiveness and sustainability as two key dimensions on which to evaluate the legitimacy of the Register. The arguments are tested on a new dataset reporting the evaluations of 1,374 stakeholders on the design and performance of the EU lobbying regulation regime. The findings describe a transparency regime that scores low in perceived effectiveness and moderate to low in sustainability . Citizens criticise the quality of information disclosed and the Register's performance as a transparency instrument. The Register did not effectively bridge the information gap between the public and interest groups about supranational lobbying. In terms of sustainability, interest organisations appreciate the systemic benefits of transparency, but identify few organisation‐level benefits. Organisations that are policy insiders incur more transparency costs so they instrumentally support transparency only insofar it suits their lobbying strategies and does not threaten their position. Insiders support including additional categories of organisations in the Register's regulatory remit but not more types of interactions with policy makers. They support an imperfect regulatory status quo to which they have adapted but lack incentives to support increased transparency and information disclosure. Targeted transparency proves an ineffective approach to regulating interest groups’ participation in EU policy making, constituting a suboptimal choice for ensuring transparent, accountable and legitimate supranational lobbying.

Accumulation mode and political interests of alternative finance and asset management: are they the same actors? Do they want the same thing?

European politicians and financial literacy activism: Does financial (in)stability matter?

Lobbying Influence -- The Role of Money, Strategies and Measurements

“I Think Therefore I Don’t Vote”: discourses on abstention, distrust and twitter politics in the 2017 French presidential election

Campaigning in an unprecedented election: issue competition in the French 2017 presidential election

To leave or not to leave? Understanding the support for the United Kingdom membership in the European Union: Identity, attitudes towards the political system and socio-economic status

Missing in Action? France and the Politicization of Trade and Investment Agreements

Study of The Relationship Between Public and Private Venture Capitalists in France: A Qualitative Approach

Who Pays a Visit to Brussels? Firm Value Effects of Cross-Border Political Access to European Commissioners

Sectors versus borders: interest group cleavages and struggles over corporate governance in the age of asset management

Competition, scandal, or ideology? A congruence analysis of Australian political finance reforms (1980–2020)

Legitimacy through targeted transparency? Regulatory effectiveness and sustainability of lobbying regulation in the European Union

Over with carbon? Investors' reaction to the Paris Agreement and the US withdrawal

Voting and turning out for monetary integration: the case of the French referendum on the Maastricht treaty

Financial Interactions and Capital Accumulation

Political Campaign finance and the United States Foreign Policy Decisions: A Cursory Look at the Jewish Lobby Group and the United States Middle East foreign policy

Creating French-style pension funds: Business, labour and the battle over patient capital

Referendum campaign financing by political parties: the case of the United Kingdom

How Dark Is It? An Investigation of Dark Money Operations in U.S. Nonprofit Political Advocacy Organizations

Social policy, public investment or the environment? Exploring variation in individual-level preferences on long-term policies

Perception of sources of private wealth. A qualitative study of perceptive schemes of Western and Eastern Bloc students