Abstract:Legal judgment prediction (LJP) is a significant task in legal intelligence, which aims to assist the judges and determine the judgment result based on the case's fact description. The judgment result consists of law articles, charge, and prison term. The law articles serve as the basis for the charge and the prison term, which can be divided into two types, named as charge-related law article and term-related law article, respectively. Recently, many methods have been proposed and made tremendous progress in LJP. However, the existing methods only focus on the prediction of the charge-related law articles, ignoring the term-related law articles (e.g., laws about lenient treatment), which limits the performance in the prison term prediction. In this paper, following the actual legal process, we expand the law article prediction as a multi-label classification task that includes both the charge-related law articles and term-related law articles and propose a novel multi-law aware LJP (ML-LJP) method to improve the performance of LJP. Given the case's fact description, firstly, the label (e.g., law article and charge) definitions in the Code of Law are used to transform the representation of the fact into several label-specific representations and make the prediction of the law articles and the charge. To distinguish the similar content of different label definitions, contrastive learning is conducted in the training. Then, a graph attention network (GAT) is applied to learn the interactions among the multiple law articles for the prediction of the prison term. Since numbers (e.g., amount of theft and weight of drugs) are important for LJP but often ignored by conventional encoders, we design a corresponding number representation method to locate and better represent these effective numbers. Extensive experiments on real-world dataset show that our method achieves the best results compared to the state-of-the-art models, especially in the task of prison term prediction where ML-LJP achieves a 10.07% relative improvement over the best baseline.

LK-IB: a hybrid framework with legal knowledge injection for compulsory measure prediction

Towards Interactivity and Interpretability: A Rationale-based Legal Judgment Prediction Framework.

LegalReasoner: A Multi-Stage Framework for Legal Judgment Prediction via Large Language Models and Knowledge Integration

Judgment Prediction via Injecting Legal Knowledge into Neural Networks

A Comprehensive Evaluation of Large Language Models on Legal Judgment Prediction

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) Amid the Advent of Autonomous AI Legal Reasoning

ML-LJP: Multi-Law Aware Legal Judgment Prediction

Iteratively Questioning and Answering for Interpretable Legal Judgment Prediction.

A Circumstance-aware Neural Framework for Explainable Legal Judgment Prediction

Optimizing Numerical Estimation and Operational Efficiency in the Legal Domain through Large Language Models

LAiW: A Chinese Legal Large Language Models Benchmark

Enabling Discriminative Reasoning in LLMs for Legal Judgment Prediction

Prototype-Based Interpretability for Legal Citation Prediction

FCA-LJP: A Method Based on Formal Concept Analysis for Case Judgment Prediction

Interpretable Cross-Examination Technique (ICE-T): Using highly informative features to boost LLM performance

Large Language Models as Fiduciaries: A Case Study Toward Robustly Communicating With Artificial Intelligence Through Legal Standards

Symbolic AI for XAI: Evaluating LFIT Inductive Programming for Fair and Explainable Automatic Recruitment

Rethinking Legal Judgement Prediction in a Realistic Scenario in the Era of Large Language Models

Precedent-Enhanced Legal Judgment Prediction with LLM and Domain-Model Collaboration

Interpretable Narrative Explanation for ML Predictors with LP: A Case Study for XAI