Abstract:The features of upper atmospheric midnight density maximum (MDM) around low geographic latitudes are studied based on neutral mass densities data at altitudes 360–480 km, derived from the accelerometer measurements aboard on the three polar orbiting satellites CHAMP (CHAllenging Minisatellite Payload), GRACE-A (Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment-A), and SWARM-C (The Earth's Magnetic Field and Environment Explorers-C). The MDM appears during the local times from 23:00 to 02:00 LT (Local Time), whose peak locates at the low latitudes within 15∘ and two valleys locate at the middle latitudes between 35∘ and 45∘ on both hemispheres separately. The structure of MDM drifts toward the southern hemisphere overall. The MDM's amplitude decreases with increases in altitude and solar radiation level. The seasonal effect weakens the MDM's amplitudes around the summer and winter solstices, while the amplitudes around the spring and autumn equinoxes are extremely significant due to the slight seasonal difference between both hemispheres. Three atmospheric density models DTM2000 (Drag Temperature Model 2000), NRLMSISE00 (US Naval Research Laboratory Mass Spectrometer and Incoherent Scatter Radar Extended atmosphere model), and JB2008 (Jacchia-Bowman 2008 model) are used to simulate the MDM along these three satellites' orbits, and compared with the observations. It is found that the JB2008 model is failed to describe the MDM, and the other two models underestimate the MDM's amplitudes at altitudes 360 km and 480 km: the simulated amplitudes by the DTM2000 model are 46% and 53% of the observed amplitudes, respectively, and only 33% and 26% for the NRLMSISE00 model. These three models are also failed to depict the MDM's variation with altitude, solar radiation level, and seasonal effects. In order to correct the model prediction, a 6th-order Legendre polynomial of geographic latitude, coupled with arguments of local time and altitude, is designed to fit the MDM signals from the three satellites' observations. In terms of amplitude and phase of the MDM, the fitting results agree with the observations very well, and the correlation coefficient is 0.923. It indicates that this empirical polynomial could be helpful to the density model correction and high accuracy prediction of spacecrafts in low Earth orbits.

Performance Analysis of NRLMSIS 2.1 Thermospheric Mass Density Model using GRACE-A and SWARM-C Observations

Recent progress on the retrieval and modeling of thermosphere mass density

Machine Learning Based Modeling of Thermospheric Mass Density

Retrieval and Analysis of Thermospheric Mass Densities below 200 Km Altitude Based on Precise Orbit Data of the Re-Entry Objects SZ-10 MODULE and TIANGONG 1

NRLMSIS 2.0: A whole‐atmosphere empirical model of temperature and neutral species densities

Improving Thermospheric Density Predictions in Low‐Earth Orbit With Machine Learning

Improving the estimation of thermospheric neutral density via two-step assimilation of in situ neutral density into a numerical model

NRLMSISE-00 empirical model of the atmosphere: Statistical comparisons and scientific issues

Comparison Between the CHAMP/STAR Derived Thermospheric Density and the NRLMSISE-00 Model

Annual and Semiannual Variations of Thermospheric Density: EOF Analysis of CHAMP and GRACE Data

Effect of the prior model-based thermospheric temperature on the mass density retrieval from accelerometer data

An Empirical Relation to Correct Storm-Time Thermospheric Mass Density Modeled by NRLMSISE-00 with CHAMP Satellite Air Drag Data

Assessing Thermospheric Neutral Density Models Using GEODYN's Precision Orbit Determination

Near-Real Time Thermospheric Density Retrieval from Precise Low Earth Orbit Spacecraft Ephemerides During Geomagnetic Storms

Evaluation of the Exospheric Temperature Modeling From Different Empirical Orthogonal Functions

The Feature Analysis and Modeling of Upper Atmospheric Midnight Density Maximum

A Global Thermospheric Density Prediction Framework Based on a Deep Evidential Method

Calibrated and Enhanced NRLMSIS 2.0 Model with Uncertainty Quantification

Physics‐based Approach to Thermospheric Density Estimation using CubeSat GPS Data

Responses of Thermospheric Mass Densities to the October 2016 and September 2017 Geomagnetic Storms Revealed From Multiple Satellite Observations