Abstract:Background: The 2014 outbreak of the Ebola virus disease highlighted the importance of overhauling and transforming healthcare systems in West Africa to improve the ability of individual countries to deal with infectious diseases. As part of this effort, in November 2016 the West African Health Organization (WAHO) began the process of institutionalizing the One Health (OH) approach to health security across the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS). The lack of clear metrics and evaluation frameworks to measure the progress of OH implementation in West Africa has been reported as a challenge. Therefore, this study sought to assess and explore whether the existing metrics of global health security frameworks can measure the successful implementation of OH activities, evaluate the progress made since 2016, and identify key areas for improvement in the region. Method: The study employed predetermined keywords to select indicators from the International Health Regulations (IHR) Monitoring Frameworks, specifically the State Party Self-Assessment Annual Report (SPAR) and Joint External Evaluation (JEE), deemed relevant to the OH approach. In addition, the COVID-19 performance index scores (severity and recovery) for June 2022 were extracted from the Global COVID-19 Index (GCI). The GCI Recovery Index evaluated the major recovery parameters reported daily to indicate how a country performed on the path to recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic compared to other countries. National documents were also analyzed using categorical variables to assess the performance status of OH platforms across implementing countries. A quantitative analysis of these indicators was conducted and supplemented with qualitative data gathered through interviews with key stakeholders. Between March and April 2022, we conducted 18 key informant interviews with purposively selected representatives from regional governmental agencies and international multilateral agencies, including ECOWAS member states. Interviews were conducted online, transcribed, and analysed following the tenets of thematic analysis. Results: Our quantitative analysis revealed no significant association between the implementation status of OH activities and any of the selected indicators from SPAR and JEE. The descriptive analysis of the JEE scores at the country level revealed that countries with existing OH platforms scored relatively higher on the selected JEE indicators than other countries in the pre-implementation stage. OH implementation status did not significantly affect COVID-19 recovery and severity indices. The qualitative findings with relevant stakeholders revealed noteworthy challenges related to insufficient human capacity, inadequate coordination, and a lack of government funding for the sustainability of OH initiatives. Nonetheless, countries in the ECOWAS region are making progress toward the integration of OH into their health security systems. Conclusion: Standardized metrics were used to assess the implementation and efficacy of OH systems in the ECOWAS region. Current indicators for monitoring global health security frameworks lack specificity and fail to comprehensively capture essential OH components, particularly at the sub-national level. To ensure consistency and effectiveness across countries, OH implementation metrics that align with global frameworks such as IHR should be developed.

Does it matter that standard preparedness indices did not predict COVID-19 outcomes?

Critical Appraisal of the Coronavirus Preparedness among Countries using the Global Health Security Index

The Global Health Security Index is not predictive of coronavirus pandemic responses among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries

Should policy makers trust composite indices? A commentary on the pitfalls of inappropriate indices for policy formation

Pandemic preparedness improves national-level SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality data completeness: a cross-country ecologic analysis

Temporal Changes in Mental Response and Prevention Patterns, and Their Impact from Uncertainty Stress During the Transition in China from the COVID-19 Epidemic to Sporadic Infection

What is the current state of public health system preparedness for infectious disease emergencies? A scoping review

Was priority setting considered in COVID-19 response planning? A global comparative analysis

The challenge of measuring emergency preparedness: integrating component metrics to build system-level measures for strategic national stockpile operations

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: How Countries Should Build More Resilient Health Systems for Preparedness and Response

Can global health security frameworks measure One Health implementation in West Africa?A mixed-methods study

Hospital COVID-19 preparedness: Are (were) we ready?

Hierarchical Model of Multi-level Index to Assess Local Resilience Capability in COVID-19

Quantifying holistic capacity response and healthcare resilience in tackling COVID-19: Assessment of country capacity by MCDM

Syncing Strategy and Execution: A Systematic Review of Public Health Preparedness Policy Implementation

Everyday capabilities were a path to resilience during COVID-19: a case study of five countries

Decision analysis of international joint prevention and control of public health emergencies

How Do Doctors and Nurses in Emergency Departments in Hong Kong View Their Disaster Preparedness? A Cross-Sectional Territory-Wide Online Survey

Pandemic Preparedness: A Scoping Review of Best and Worst Practices from COVID-19

Public Health Preparedness and Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic in South Asia: A Situation and Policy Analysis.

A short study comparing countries on the quality of response to the Covid-19 pandemic