Barriers to recording calf health data on dairy farms in Ontario

Kristen Y. Edwards,Stephen J. LeBlanc,Trevor J. DeVries,Michael A. Steele,Joao H.C. Costa,David L. Renaud

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2023-0398

2023-09-23

JDS Communications

Abstract:Highlights • The majority of dairy farms had incomplete calf health records. • Paper calf health records are less complete than computer software records. • Records analysis and feedback motivates farmers to record calf health data. • Recording practices are improved when calf health records are kept near calves. Establishing accurate illness and treatment rates in dairy calves is crucial, yet calf health records are often incomplete. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate barriers for dairy farmers for recording calf illnesses and treatments on dairy farms in Ontario, Canada. An online survey was completed by a convenience sample of 88 Ontario dairy farms in 2022, with 34 questions regarding farm demographics, current practices surrounding record keeping and analysis, and factors that would improve recording compliance. Multivariable models were built to assess associations between explanatory variables and the following outcomes: likelihood of making management or treatment protocol changes based on records analysis, factors that would increase the use of electronic recording methods, and whether all calf illnesses and treatments are recorded. Pearson's chi-squared tests were also used to investigate associations between explanatory variables and whether the respondent agreed or disagreed with a proposed reason for why a calf illness or treatment would not be recorded on their farm. Producers had 3.45 times greater odds of recording all antimicrobial treatments if they used a computer software system compared with those that did not. With respect to anti-inflammatory treatments, producers had 3.11 times greater odds of recording these treatments if records were located in the calf barn than elsewhere. Nonfamily employees had 6.08 times greater odds of recording all supportive therapy treatments than farm owners. When calf health records were kept in the calf barn, respondents were less likely to report that illnesses were not recorded due to time constraints (5% vs. 36% if records were elsewhere) or because calf health records were not analyzed (10% vs. 34% if records were elsewhere). On farms that recorded calf treatments in a paper booklet, respondents were more likely to report that treatments were not recorded because calf health records were not analyzed (44% for paper records vs. 21% for other systems). The most commonly indicated factors that would increase recording of illness were recording with a mobile app (27% of respondents) and for the recording system to be easy to use (31% of respondents). Overall, these data indicate that recording may be improved by keeping calf health records in close proximity to the calves and using a recording method that allows for data analysis. An easy-to-use mobile app may also improve recording if it could be used in the calf barn, provide data analytics, and allow for time-efficient data entry. Graphical Download : Download high-res image (159KB) Download : Download full-size image Summary: An online survey was completed by a convenience sample of 88 dairy producers in Ontario, Canada, to investigate barriers for dairy farmers for recording calf illnesses and treatments. Less than a quarter of farms surveyed recorded all calf illnesses and less than half of farms recorded all administered antimicrobial treatments. We identified several factors associated with a producer's likelihood of recording calf illnesses and treatments, such as recording with a computer software system, keeping records in close proximity to the calves, and being a nonfamily employee. Several barriers were also identified, including lack of feedback from analysis of recorded calf data, records not being located near the calves, and records in a paper booklet.