Abstract:Sourcing sound materials from distant and foreign locations has become a relatively common and elementary practice for the electroacoustic music composer to engage with. The ease and frequency of traveling has been responsible, in part, widening the availability of sound choice and collection and in turn providing a vast “acoustic palette as wide as that of the environment itself” 1 . This practice of cross-cultural sound sourcing may be understood by our attraction to the exotic, and the unadulterated soundworld sonic souvenirs can yield. The need for originality as a consideration for the electroacoustic music composer can be addressed through seeking out new and unique sound materials in this way. With reference to terminology, ‘sonic souvenirs’ 2 are discussed in an authentic sense and may be characterised by their environmental, instrumental or verbal origin. It is their significance and association with a unique place or culture that defines them. This paper attempts to make the distinction between elusive sonic souvenirs and more locally sourced sound materials, readily available within a composer’s vicinity. In many respects, the analogy of the keepsake souvenir picked up on a holiday presents a point of departure. Souvenirs are attractive mementos, but also tend to be mass marketed items, symbolic of an original object, lacking genuine status. They provide a memory or representation of our personal traveling history, acting as trophies of our accomplished globetrotting. While in practice, importing sonic souvenirs into the studio remains unchanged from ordinary recording work conducted around and on our immediate doorstep, the significance of those materials can present a challenge in terms of their integration, consequence and reception of the finished work. The use of these sounds and the artistic endeavors that transform and sculpt these sounds into music raises a number of issues ofownership, integrity and appropriation. The need to be respectful in sourcing materials from outside ones own cultural home is often high on the composer’s agenda, but what does respectful borrowing entail? How do insiders and outsides of a given culture receive this practice? What are the benefits and positive outcomes of this hybrid format? And how does this practice relate to common areas of investigation within ethnomusicology?

Gamelanesque effects

Colonialism and Nationalism in Traditional Javanese Gamelan Music: Changing Musical Aesthetics

Exploring The Many Tunings of Balinese Gamelan

The Forging of a “Singapore Sound” in Saxophone Compositions of Zechariah Goh

World music: deterritorializing place and identity

The Exoticism of Olivier Messiaen

Geometries in sound: an investigation of embodied cognition in contemporary art music

Nunggak semi Al Suwardi: organology and perspective of harmonic planet music creation

Rituals of creativity: tradition, modernity, and the "acoustic unconscious" in a U.S. collegiate jazz music program

What Does Musicking Afford?

New Perspectives of the Research Of Galant Style in Musical Culture: The Concept of Robert O. Gjerdingen

Line Rider and Ludomusical Excesses

The Key Debates of Musical Exoticism and Orientalism in Historical Musicology

Angloglobalism, multilingualism and world literature

Importing the Sonic Souvenir: issues of cross-cultural composition

Universalism, or the fabrication of concert music

Instruments of Power. The affective power of sound design in American music education

Soundscape Composition as Global Music: Electroacoustic music as soundscape

Unpacking the Form and Structure of Jaya Baya Music Composition in JES Gamelan Fusion

When the local encounters the global: aesthetic conflicts in the Chinese traditional music world

Early Discourse About Video Game Music in Japan