Humeral lengthening: Systematic Review and Meta Analysis

Ahmed M. Abd El-Hamid,A.Gamal Hosny,Mohamed A.Anter,Ahmed Abd El-Hamid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2023.195831.1094
2023-03-25
Benha Journal of Applied Sciences
Abstract:Background: The humerus lengthening was mostly regarded an aesthetic procedure. Recent studyindicates, however, that the objectives of bilateral humeral lengthening in achondroplasia are not justcosmetic, but also to restore proportions between the upper and lower limbs, extend reach, and enhancethe capacity to perform perineal personal hygiene. This study's objective was to conduct acomprehensive evaluation and analysis of the outcomes of humeral lengthening. Methods: During thissystematic review and meta-analysis preparation, we adhered to the PRISMA statement criteria andfollowed the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Results: We identified eightstudies discussing humeral lengthening including a total number of 158 humeri in 129 patients. The agerange of patients across the studies ranged between 6.5 and 20 years. The male gender was commonand ranging from 33% to 78%. The humeral lengthening was conducted among 158 humeri amongthem 34 in the right side. The mean length achieved was 7.7 cm among the included eight145 studiesranging from 5.1 cm to 9 cm. Pooled analysis of the involved trials showed significant associationbetween length pre and post humeral lengthening (OR = -6.08; 95% CI: [-6.79, -5.38]; P = <0.00001).The pooled studies were not heterogenous (I2 = 0%, P < 0.46). Conclusions: The lengthening of thehumerus was regarded mostly as a cosmetic procedure. Using a variety of external fixators andintramedullary (IM) nails, the humerus was extended by distraction osteogenesis. There is a statisticallysignificant link between length before and after humeral lengthening, although neither range of motionnor functional score are affected.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?