Abstract:Premise Barriers at different reproductive stages contribute to reproductive isolation. Self‐incompatibility (SI) systems that prevent self‐pollination could also act to control interspecific pollination and contribute to reproductive isolation, preventing hybridization. Here we evaluated whether SI contributes to reproductive isolation among four co‐occurring Opuntia species that flower at similar times and may hybridize with each other. Methods We assessed whether Opuntia cantabrigiensis, O. robusta, O. streptacantha, and O. tomentosa, were self‐compatible and formed hybrid seeds in five manipulation treatments to achieve self‐pollination, intraspecific cross‐pollination, open pollination (control), interspecific crosses or apomixis, then recorded flowering phenology and synchrony. Results All species flowered in the spring with a degree of synchrony, so that two pairs of species were predisposed to interspecific pollination (O. cantabrigiensis with O. robusta, O. streptacantha with O. tomentosa). All species had distinct reproductive systems: Opuntia cantabrigiensis is self‐incompatible and did not produce hybrid seeds as an interspecific pollen recipient; O. robusta is a dioecious species, which formed a low proportion of hybrid seeds; O. streptacantha and O. tomentosa are self‐compatible and produced hybrid seeds. Conclusions Opuntia cantabrigiensis had a strong pollen–pistil barrier, likely due to its self‐incompatibility. Opuntia robusta, the dioecious species, is an obligate outcrosser and probably partially lost its ability to prevent interspecific pollen germination. Given that the self‐compatible species can set hybrid seeds, we conclude that pollen–pistil interaction and high flowering synchrony represent weak barriers; whether reproductive isolation occurs later in their life cycle (e.g., germination or seedling survival) needs to be determined.

Incompatibility Systems in Fruit Crops: Applications and Achievements

Systems and Breakdown of Self-Incompatibility

Molecular insights into self-incompatibility systems: from evolution to breeding

Self-incompatibility: a targeted, unexplored pre-fertilization barrier in flower crops of Asteraceae

Advances in Research of the Self-Incompatibility Genotypes(S-genotypes)in Apple

Molecular Control of S-RNase-based Self-incompatibility

Molecular Determinants and Mechanisms of Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility in Fruit Trees of Rosaceae

Molecular Research Progress on Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility in Rosaceae Species

Advance in Molecular Mechanisms of Self-Incompatibility in Rosaceae Fruit Trees

Plasticity in the Self-Incompatibility System of Cultivated Nicotiana Alata

Determination of Self-(In)compatibility and Inter-(In)compatibility Relationships in Citrus Using Manual Pollination, Microscopy, and S-Genotype Analyses.

A Molecular Evolutionary Framework of Self-Incompatibility in the Angiosperms

Recent Advances on S-RNase and SFB Homologus Key Genes of Gametophytic Self-incompatibility in Fruit Trees

Genetic Mechanisms for Hybrid Breeding in Vegetable Crops

Progress on The functional gene of cell-cell signal transduction in self-incompatibility of Brassica oleracea L.

Self-incompatibility in Papaver: Advances in Integrating the Signalling Network

Progress on characterization of self-incompatibility in Brassica napus L.

Origin, Loss, and Regain of Self-Incompatibility in Angiosperms.

The genetic characterization of self-incompatibility in a Brassica napus line with promising breeding potential

Research Progress in Molecule of Sporophytic Self-Incompatibility in Plants

Is self‐incompatibility a reproductive barrier for hybridization in a sympatric species?