A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY TO DETERMINE THE PREDICTIVE FACTORS OF DIFFICULT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Venkata Krishna B R,G Cyril Abhishikth
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36106/ijar/7605583
2023-07-01
Indian Journal Of Applied Research
Abstract:Objective To determine the clinical and radiological predictive factors for difcult laparoscopic cholecystectomy Methods A prospective study was done among 50 patients admitted to Akash Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre during the period of May 2022 to May 2023. The patients who presented with upper abdominal pain, vomiting or dyspepsia are studied in detail clinically and investigations were done. All patients are subjected to ultrasonographic evaluation. The patients conrmed by USG examination were evaluated with following factors: age, sex, BMI (>/ /< 3 mm), pericholecystic collection, number (solitary versus multiple) and liver parenchyma (Normal, fatty inltration, liver brosis) were noted. Following evaluation the patients were subjected to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and the following operative parameters like access to peritoneal cavity (easy/difcult), bleeding during surgery (normal/abnormal), gall bladder bed dissection (easy/difcult), injury to duct/artery, extraction of gall bladder (easy/difcult), or conversion to open surgery were noted. Analyses of pre operative risk factors, their relation to the dependent factors are performed using t-test, chi squared test and signicance (p value 32.5, history of cholecystitis previous abdominal surgery, gall bladder wall thickness >3mm, pericholecystic collection, liver brosis were signicant predictive factors of difcult laparoscopic cholecystecomy. There were no signicant predictive factors for conversion to open surgery on analysis in this study. The clinical and ultrasonographi Conclusion c ndings help to predict a difcult laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This information is useful to the patient and operating surgeon. The conversion rate from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open cholecystectomy was 8% and there were no signicant predictive factors for it on analysis in this study
What problem does this paper attempt to address?