Abstract:Abstract Background Loneliness in later life is largely presented as a problem of the individual focusing upon antecedents such as demographic or health factors. Research examining the role of the broader living environments is much rarer. We examined the relationship between loneliness and three dimensions of the lived environment: geographical region, deprivation, and area classification (urban or rural). Methods Our sample consisted of 4663 core members (44% males) aged 50+ (wave 7 mean age 72.8, S.D. = 7.1) present both in waves 3 (2006) and 7 (2014) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Loneliness was measured using two approaches, individual and area-based, and both waves included these questions. Individual-based (self-reported) loneliness was assessed using the three item University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) scale (ranging from 3 = not lonely to 9 = lonely) with a score of 6+ defining loneliness. We also used a novel question which asked participants to evaluate how often they felt lonely in their area of residence (area-based; ranging from 1 = often to 7 = never, using cut off 4+ to define loneliness). The lived environment was classified in three different ways: the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD), Government Office Regions (GOR), and area classification (urban or rural). Covariates with established relationship with loneliness including demographic factors, social engagement and health, were included in the analyses. Results In wave 7, the prevalence of individual-based loneliness was 18% and area-based was 25%. There was limited congruence between measures: 68% participants reported no individual- or area-based loneliness and 9% reported loneliness for both measures. After adjusting for individual co-variates only one significant relationship was observed between loneliness and area -based characteristics. A significant association was observed between area-based loneliness and deprivation score, with higher levels of loneliness in more deprived areas (OR = 1.4 for highest quintile of deprivation). Conclusions Our results indicate that loneliness in older adults is higher in the most deprived areas independent of individual-level factors. In order to develop appropriate interventions further research is required to investigate how area-level factors combine with individual-level loneliness vulnerability measures to generate increased levels of loneliness in deprived areas.

The Relationship Between Rural-Urban Place of Residence and Subjective Well-Being is Nonlinear and its Substantive Significance is Questionable

Spatial dimension of subjective well-being

The urban desirability paradox: U.K. urban-rural differences in well-being, social satisfaction, and economic satisfaction

What makes older adults happier? Urban and rural differences in the living arrangements and life satisfaction of older adults

The Effects of Urban Living Conditions on Subjective Well-Being: The Case of German Foreign Service Employees

Big-city Life (Dis)satisfaction? The Effect of Urban Living on Subjective Well-Being

Life satisfaction along the urban-rural continuum: a global assessment

Influence of Prudential Value on the Subjective Well-Being of Chinese Urban–Rural Residents

Urban-Rural Dichotomy of Quality of Life

Are there place-based disparities in mortality risk? Findings from two longitudinal studies.

Spatial Heterogeneity and Subjective Wellbeing: Exploring the Role of Social Capital in Metropolitan Areas Using Multilevel Modelling

Urban-Rural Divide,Employment,and Subjective Well-Being

Subjective well-being and urbanization in Egypt

Living Alone in the City: Differentials in Subjective Well-Being Among Single Households 1995–2018

Rural urban differences in self-rated health among older adults: examining the role of marital status and living arrangements

Research on Subjective Well-being Differences between Urban and Rural Residents and Their Influence Factors——Take Chengdu City as a Case

Lonely places or lonely people? Investigating the relationship between loneliness and place of residence

Not all types of nature have an equal effect on urban residents' well-being: A structural equation model approach

A Meta-analysis of the Differences Between Urban and Rural Well-beings from Three Components

Mental Health in Urbanized vs. Rural Areas in Salzburg, Austria

Regional Heterogeneity of Life Satisfaction in Urban China: Evidence from Hierarchical Ordered Logit Analysis