Abstract:Background: Defence mechanisms and coping strategies rely on different theoretical backgrounds and describe distinct psychological processes. Cramer has based a distinction on the following dimensions: conscious processes vs. not; intentionality vs. not; hierarchical conception vs. not. On the contrary to these distinctions, the two notions of defense mechanisms and coping strategies are defined as similar in the Diagnostical and Statistical Manual (DSM IV). This assimilation between coping and defenses in the DSM IV is not confirmed by some researches, namely the one by Callahan and Chabrol. It indeed proves a relationship between adaptive coping and mature defenses, as well as between maladaptive coping and immature defenses. Similarly, Plutchik offered theoretical correspondences between eight defense mechanisms and eight coping strategies: (a) Defenses: repression, isolation, introjection and Coping escape; (b) Defense denial and Coping minimalization; (c) Defense undoing and coping substitution; (d) Defenses: regression, acting out and coping social support; (e) Defenses: compensation, identification, fantasy and coping replacement; (f) Defenses: intellectualization, sublimation, annulation, rationalisation and coping: planification; (g) Defense projection and coping blame; (h) Defense: reactional formation and coping inversion. Goal: this research aims at testing the relations observed by Callahan and Chabrol and some theoretical correspondences proposed by Plutchik between defences and coping strategies in a population of students similar to the one used by Callahan and Chabrol. It also aims at studying the relationships between coping strategies and conscious derives of defense mechanisms, such as defined by Bond (1995). Defenses were evaluated the first day of the examination week. Population: the population includes 184 women students in human sciences (sociology and psychology). Instruments: defenses were evaluated with the Defense Style Questionnaire by Bond (DSQ 40). Its French version is made of 40 items and validated by Guelfi et al. It explores 20 defense mechanisms, as well as 3 defense styles: (1) a "mature style", composed by 4 defenses: sublimation, humor, anticipation, repression; (2) a "neurotic style", composed by 4 defenses: annulation, reactional formation, altruism and idealization; (3) an "immature style", composed by 12 defenses. Coping strategies were measured by the French version of the Way of Coping Check-List-Revised, (WCC-R) by Lazarus and Folkman, validated by Graziani et al. It evaluates 10 factors: 1) Problem solving; 2) Evasion; 3) Social support; 4) Self-control; 5) Escape; 6) Responsabilization-Replanification; 7) Resignation; 8)Diplomacy; 9) Confrontation; 10) Personal evolution. Results: Our results confirm partially Callahan and Chabrol's conclusions in favour of existing relationships between adaptive coping strategies and mature defenses, as well as between maladaptive coping strategies and immature defenses. They demonstrate three positive relationships: 1) a relation between Problem solving resolution coping and two mature defenses (Sublimation, Anticipation); 2) a relation between Evasion coping and nevrotic and immature defenses; 3) a relation between Escaping coping and immature defenses. The correspondences between defense mechanisms and coping strategies, such as proposed by Plutchik psycho-evolutionist emotional model are partly validated. Some links were indeed validated in this research, between: a) Defense Undoing and Escaping or Evasion coping; b) Defense Fantasy and Responzabilization coping, c) Defense Sublimation and Problem solving resolution coping; d) Defense Sublimation and Responsabilization coping or Problem solving resolution coping; e) Défense Annulation and Responzabilisation coping.

Application Of The Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ) Model Of Self Defense Mechanism In Post Stroke Patients

Kecenderungan Mekanisme Pertahanan Diri Remaja dalam Situasi Konflik, Cemas, dan Frustrasi

Predictive Model of Self-management in Patients With Stroke Based on the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model

Factors Affecting Coping Strategies in Post-Stroke Patients: A Literature Study

Defense mechanism and personality of patients with major depression

The application of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy as an adjunctive therapy to alleviate depressive symptoms in post-stroke patients: a case report

APPLICATION OF HEALTH PROMOTION MODEL FOR BETTER SELF-CARE BEHAVIOR IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETES MELLITUS

The Combination of Sensor Digital Kariasa Early Detection Prototype and Health Education for Self-Management in Preventing Recurrent Ischemic Stroke

PRIMARY FAMILY CAREGIVER PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS OF STROKE SURVIVORS AT RSUD DR. H. SLAMET MARTODIRJDJO PAMEKASAN

THE INTERPLAY OF DEFENSE MECHANISMS, COPING STRATEGIES, AND SELF-ACCEPTANCE IN ADOLESCENT DEVELOPMENT: STUDY DESIGN

Defense Mechanism as a Strategy to Overcome Jacob's Anxiety in William Landay's Defending Jacob

[Relationships between defense mechanisms and coping strategies, facing exam anxiety performance]

Perceptions Of Self-Management Role, Barriers, Facilitators Among Stroke Survivors: A Qualitative Study

Correlation Between Defense Mechanisms and Parenting Style of Adolescents With Non-Suicidal Self-Injury

How is self-management perceived by community living people after a stroke? A focus group study

Factors Influencing Stroke Internal Stigma Among Stroke Survivors

Improving The Self-Efficacy of Post-Stroke Patients Using The Application of Life Review Therapy

Factors affecting stroke pre-hospital delay behavioral intention among community residents: A path analysis

Applying a Motivational Instructional Design Model to Stroke Rehabilitation: A Feasibility Study on Occupational and Swallowing Therapies

“Perrotta Human Defense Mechanisms Questionnaire (PDM-Q-v2)”: Development, regulation and validation of a psychometric instrument for the identification of the functioning of individual Ego defense mechanisms

<TITLE>THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF MISUSE SYNDROME AFTER STROKE