Abstract:Background: Prevalence estimates of chronic disease vary according to the technique used. Questionnaire surveys may be susceptible to inaccuracies, which may be overcome by addition of a checklist of conditions. This paper presents SF-36 scores and NHS consultation rates for people reporting individual chronic diseases or disabilities in two questionnaire surveys, one of which employed a checklist and one of which did not. We aimed to document differences in estimates of disease prevalence, and to determine whether or not subjective impact on quality of life is the same in people recruited by a checklist as in those who volunteer that they have a chronic disease or disability without the prompt of a checklist. We use these data to estimate the contribution that different chronic diseases and disabilities make to the burden of disease in the community. Methods: Data were collected in two postal questionnaire surveys conducted in 1991 and 1997 with response rates of 72 per cent and 64 per cent. Both questionnaires included a question on long-standing illness, disability or infirmity, together with the SF-36 health status measure. Respondents to the 1991 survey were asked to specify their illness in a free text response, whereas the 1997 survey offered a checklist of conditions. Prevalence rates of each condition were calculated, together with an 'escalation factor' representing the increase in reporting of specific diseases between the surveys. SF-36 domain and component summary scores were calculated overall and for the groups reporting individual chronic diseases or disabilities. Disease-specific NHS consultation rates were calculated for both surveys. Results: The overall reported rate of chronic disease and disability increased from 28 per cent in 1991 to 42 per cent in 1997. Reported levels of mental health problems and of conditions with a perceived psychosomatic element increased substantially, whereas rates of well-defined conditions were similar. The pattern of SF-36 scores for those reporting chronic disease or disability was similar in the two surveys in spite of very different prevalence rates, and respondents reporting chronic disease had similar levels of health service use. This suggests that they were reporting conditions with similar levels of impact on quality of life. Heart disease, arthritis and mental health problems had the greatest impact on quality of life, and asthma and hypertension the least. Conclusions: Evidence from SF-36 scores and NHS consultation rates suggests that addition of a checklist of conditions to this community health survey encouraged reporting of illnesses by the genuinely ill and not merely by those who are less severely affected by their disease. This method appears to give a more accurate reflection of health needs than information derived from routine data sources. The combination of prevalence data combined with subjective assessment of quality of life allows an alternative perspective of health needs. This approach highlights the relative importance of musculo-skeletal problems, particularly back pain, and mental health problems to the burden of disease, and the relative lack of importance of conditions such as asthma. It presents a contrast to studies based on other methods of health needs assessment.

Utility of Health data from Social Surveys: Is There a Gold Standard for Measuring Morbidity?

Comparison of self-reports and biomedical measurements on hypertension and diabetes among older adults in China

Perceived health: age and sex comparisons in a community.

Self-reported health, functional status and chronic disease in community dwelling older adults: untangling the role of demographics

Compared to whom? An investigation of the relative health comparisons of well people

Age, socioeconomic status, and health

Validity of a Dietary Questionnaire Assessed by Comparison with Multiple Weighed Dietary Records or 24-Hour Recalls.

Reliability and Validity of Self-Rated General Health

Self-Rated Health, Interviewer-Rated Health, and Their Predictive Powers on Mortality in Old Age.

Reproducibility and Validity of a Semiquantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire in Men Assessed by Multiple Methods

Estimates and determinants of valid self-reports of musculoskeletal disease in the elderly.

Self-rated Health Over the Life Course: Evidence from the 1958 and 1970 British Birth Cohorts

Estimating life expectancy adjusted by self-rated health status in the United States: national health interview survey linked to the mortality

Understanding morbidity change

Identification of Mood Disorders in Self‐Reported Versus Health Administrative Data

Comparing the performance of two social risk screening tools in a vulnerable subpopulation

A Single-Item Self-Rated Health Measure Correlates with Objective Health Status in the Elderly: a Survey in Suburban Beijing

Estimating health needs: the impact of a checklist of conditions and quality of life measurement on health information derived from community surveys

The Relationship of Chronic Diseases and Health Status to the Health Services Utilization of Older Americans

Social status and health: a comparison of British civil servants in Whitehall-II with European- and African-Americans in CARDIA