Abstract:Abstract Background Endoscopic resection is the standard of care for the management of colorectal polyps. Larger and more complex polyps require endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). While complications have been low, EMR is often piecemeal, resulting in indeterminant margins and often a higher recurrence rate. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an advanced endoscopic resection technique with a higher rate of en bloc resection. While more data exist for the resection of gastric lesions with ESD, ESD is becoming more widely used in western countries for the resection of colorectal lesions. Purpose The purpose of this study is to report on the outcomes and rates of complications for colorectal ESD completed in a tertiary centre in British Columbia. Method All colorectal ESD was completed by a senior therapeutic endoscopist who has previously received training in Japan. Retrospective data were collected on all colorectal ESD procedures done in St. Paul’s Hospital from July 11th, 2016, when the procedure first became available, to Aug 30th, 2022. Inclusion criteria were all adults who have undergone ESD for resection of a colorectal lesion. Exclusion criteria were patients younger than 18. Data collected included demographic variables, polyp characteristics, procedural outcomes, and complications. Result(s) A total of 39 ESD procedures were completed. The mean size of the resected lesion was 30.4 mm (range: 5 – 60 mm). Technical success, defined as successful resection of all polypoid tissue, was achieved in 35/39 procedures (89.7%). En-bloc resection was achieved in 27/35 (77.1%) of the completed ESD. The rate of R0 resection was 22/35 (62.9%). Curative resection, defined as technically successful ESD with R0 margin and no lymphovascular invasion, was achieved in 23/39 (59.0%) of the cases and the majority of the patients with non-curative resection that underwent endoscopic surveillance had no recurrence on follow-up. In our cohort, 3/39 (7.7%) patients had adenocarcinoma. None of the ESD resulted in any intra-procedural or delayed perforation. 3/39 (7.7%) patients had clinically significant post-endoscopic resection bleeding. Out of 24 patients that completed follow-up, 4 (16.7%) had recurrence at the resection site that was managed endoscopically. 4/39 (10.3%) of patients required surgery post-ESD. Conclusion(s) In our cohort, ESD is an effective endoscopic resection modality for the management of colorectal adenomas and early adenocarcinoma with a high rate of technical success and low rates of complications. Although the rate of curative resection was low, most were the result of R1 or Rx resection and a majority of the follow-ups in this subgroup demonstrated no further recurrence. The rate of en bloc resection is high, especially given the average size of adenomas in this cohort. Although ESD requires high technical proficiency, its favorable outcomes and low complication rates make ESD highly feasible for the resection of colorectal lesions. Please acknowledge all funding agencies by checking the applicable boxes below None Disclosure of Interest None Declared

Use of endoscopic submucosal dissection or full-thickness resection device to treat residual colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection: a multicenter historical cohort study

Concerns about the study of Yzet et al. on treatment of residual colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection

Clinical outcome of non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for early colorectal cancer

Outcome after colorectal full-thickness resection and management of recurrence

Impact of annual case volume on colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes in a large prospective cohort study

Endoscopic full-thickness resection of T1 colorectal cancers: a retrospective analysis from a multicenter Dutch eFTR registry

A large multicenter cohort on the use of full-thickness resection device for difficult colonic lesions

Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms: Prospective, multicenter, cohort trial

Technical failure during colorectal endoscopic full-thickness resection: the "through thick and thin" study

Using Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection as a Routine Component of the Standard Treatment Strategy for Large and Complex Colorectal Lesions in a Western Tertiary Referral Unit

Meta-Analysis of Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection Versus Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Complex Colorectal Lesions

A129 OUTCOMES FOLLOWING ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF SUPERFICIAL GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT NEOPLASTIC LESIONS FROM A TERTIARY-CARE ACADEMIC CENTRE

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Resections Larger than 10 cm: Outcomes from a Portuguese Center

Pattern of Residual Submucosal Involvement after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer: A Rationale for the Utility of Endoscopic Submucosal Resection

A131 ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION OF COLORECTAL ADENOMAS AND EARLY ADENOCARCINOMAS: OUTCOMES FROM BRITISH COLUMBIA

Current status of endoscopic full-thickness resection for treatment of colorectal neoplastic lesions

Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal neuroendocrine tumours: A multicentric retrospective study

Long-Term Follow-Up After Non-Curative Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastrointestinal Cancer—A Retrospective Multicenter Analysis

Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Rectal Neoplasms Extending to the Dentate Line: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Feasibility of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Neoplasia at Anastomotic Sites: a Retrospective Study

A208 ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION (ESD) FOR BARRETT’S NEOPLASIA: CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND MID-TERM FOLLOW-UP AT A CANADIAN TERTIARY REFERRAL CENTER