Evaluating the prediction performance of objective physical activity measures for incident Parkinson’s disease in the UK Biobank

Angela Zhao,Erjia Cui,Andrew Leroux,Martin A. Lindquist,Ciprian M. Crainiceanu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11939-0
2023-08-24
Journal of Neurology
Abstract:BackgroundParkinson’s disease (PD) is the fastest-growing neurological condition with over 10 million cases worldwide. While age and sex are known predictors of incident PD, there is a need to identify other predictors. This study compares the prediction performance of accelerometry-derived physical activity (PA) measures and traditional risk factors for incident PD in the UK Biobank.MethodsThe study population consisted of 92,352 UK Biobank participants without PD at baseline (43.8% male, median age 63 years with interquartile range 43–69). 245 participants were diagnosed with PD by April 1, 2021 (586,604 person-years of follow-up). The incident PD prediction performances of 10 traditional predictors and 8 objective PA measures were compared using single- and multi-variable Cox models. Prediction performance was assessed using a novel, stable statistic: the repeated cross-validated concordance (rcvC). Sensitivity analyses were conducted where PD cases diagnosed within the first six months, one year, and two years were deleted.ResultsSingle-predictor Cox regression models indicated that all PA measures were statistically significant (p-values < 0.0001). The highest-performing individual predictors were total acceleration (TA) (rcvC = 0.813) among PA measures, and age (rcvC = 0.757) among traditional predictors. The two-step forward-selection process produced a model containing age, sex, and TA (rcvC = 0.851). Adding TA to the model increased the rcvC by 9.8% (p-value < 0.0001). Results were largely unchanged in sensitivity analyses.ConclusionsObjective PA summaries have better single-predictor model performance than known risk factors and increase the prediction performance substantially when added to models with age and sex.
clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?