Abstract:The Value-at-Risk (VaR) metric serves as a pivotal tool for quantifying market risk, offering an estimation of potential investment losses. Predominantly employed within financial sectors, it aids in adhering to regulatory mandates and in devising capital reserve strategies. Nonetheless, the predictive precision of VaR models frequently faces scrutiny, particularly during crises and heightened uncertainty phases. Phenomena like volatility clustering impinge on the accuracy of these models. To mitigate such constraints, conditional volatility models are integrated to augment the robustness and adaptability of VaR approaches. This study critically evaluates the efficacy of GARCH-type VaR models within the transportation sector amidst the Thai stock market’s volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic. The dataset encompasses daily price fluctuations in the Transportation Sector index (TRANS), the Service Industry index (SERVICE), and 17 pertinent stocks within the Stock Exchange of Thailand, spanning from 28 December 2018 to 28 December 2023, thereby encapsulating the pandemic era. The employed GARCH-type VaR models include GARCH (1,1) VaR, ARMA (1,1)—GARCH (1,1) VaR, GARCH (1,1)—M VaR, IGARCH (1,1) VaR, EWMA VaR, and csGARCH (1,1) VaR. These are juxtaposed with more traditional, less computationally intensive models like the Historical Simulation VaR and Delta Normal VaR. The backtesting methodologies encompass Kupiec’s POF test, the Independence Test, and Christoffersen’s Interval Forecast test. Intriguingly, the findings reveal that the Historical Simulation VaR model surpasses GARCH-type VaR models in failure rate accuracy. Within the GARCH-type category, the EWMA VaR model exhibited superior failure rate accuracy. The csGARCH (1,1) VaR and EWMA VaR models emerged as notably robust. These findings bear significant implications for managerial decision-making in financial risk management.

Identifying systemic risk of assets during international financial crises using Value at Risk elasticities

Evaluating the Default Risk of Bond Portfolios with Extreme Value Theory

Value-at-risk (VAR) estimation and backtesting during COVID-19: Empirical analysis based on BRICS and US stock markets

An extreme value approach to CoVaR estimation

Measuring systemic risk via GAS models and extreme value theory: Revisiting the 2007 financial crisis

Non-extensive value-at-risk estimation during times of crisis

An empirical review of dynamic extreme value models for forecasting value at risk, expected shortfall and expectile

Systemic risk indicator based on implied and realized volatility

Forecasting Value-at-Risk of Financial Markets under the Global Pandemic of COVID-19 Using Conditional Extreme Value Theory

On the estimation of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall at extreme levels

A framework for assessing the systemic risk of major financial institutions

FRM Financial Risk Meter for Emerging Markets

Risk Measures Estimation Under Wasserstein Barycenter

Assessing Financial Stability in Turbulent Times: A Study of Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity-Type Value-at-Risk Model Performance in Thailand’s Transportation Sector during COVID-19

An evaluation of the adequacy of Lévy and extreme value tail risk estimates

Global financial crisis and multiscale systematic risk: Evidence from selected European stock markets

Market Volatility Spillover, Network Diffusion, and Financial Systemic Risk Management: Financial Modeling and Empirical Study

Neural Networks and Value at Risk

Analyzing selected cryptocurrencies spillover effects on global financial indices: Comparing risk measures using conventional and eGARCH-EVT-Copula approaches

Measuring and Testing Systemic Risk from the Cross-Section of Stock Returns

Value-at-Risk: The Effect of Autoregression in a Quantile Process