Abstract:The high gravimetric and volumetric capacity of silicon makes it an attractive anode material for lithium-ion solid-state batteries (SSBs). [1,2] However, silicon suffers from high volume changes during cycling and requires high stack pressures to stabilize the interfaces. [3-5] Herein, we present different approaches to minimize the breathing of silicon-based anodes leading to stabilized cycling. Silicon carbon void structures (Si-C) obtain a void between the silicon nanoparticle and the surrounding carbon matrix to compensate the volume changes already within the anode structure. As a result, excellent cycling performance in solid-state cells with areal loadings as high as 7.4 mAh cm -2 can be demonstrated. Thereby, Si-C composite electrodes show higher lithiation capacities, better rate stability and higher capacity retentions than pristine silicon nanoparticles (SiNPs), which rapidly degrade due to the immense mechanical stress upon charging and discharging. Hence, the volume changes of the SiNPs are well compensated by the carbon matrix, which also stabilizes the entire electrode. In full cells with nickel-rich NCM (LiNi 0.9 Co 0.05 Mn 0.05 O 2 , 210 mAh g -1 ) as cathode, higher initial discharge capacities and coulombic efficiencies (72.7 % vs. 31.0 %) can be achieved compared to the liquid system. The solid electrolyte (Li 6 PS 5 Cl, 3 mS cm -1 ) does not penetrate the whole carbon matrix of the Si-C particles resulting in less side reactions. Consequently, prelithiation of the Si-C anodes is not required in SSBs. By applying either a low (1.1) or rather high n/p ratio (2.0) capacity retentions of up to 87.7 % after 50 cycles can be reached. [6] Especially for industrial fabrication of SSB anodes other procedures than the complex multi-step synthesis of e.g. Si-C composites are needed. [7] Consequently, we evaluated low-cost silicon microparticles (μm-Si) as partially lithiated electrode material (800 mAh g -1 ) in SSB half- and full cells. By reducing the utilized fraction of silicon, the breathing during cycling is reduced from 300 % to 66 %, which reduces the armorphization of the active material. In addition, the grain boundaries of silicon are connected by a matrix of solid electrolyte and carbon additive, which drastically reduces the need for a high stack pressure. After limiting the charge cut-off potential of NCM|SE|μm-Si full cells, significant increased capacity retentions from 32 % to 71 % after 50 cycles can be reached. In addition, similar performance compared to the Si-C electrodes can be demonstrated making it to an auspicious alternative. [8] Overall, the herein presented silicon materials achieved decent electrochemical performance without active pressure control on the cells being beneficial for electric vehicle and other applications. Hence, both Si-C and μm-Si particles are promising concepts for stable, high-capacity SSB anodes. Literature: [1] A. Mukanova, A. Jetybayeva, S.-T. Myung, S.-S. Kim, Z. Bakenov, Mater. Today Energy 2018, 9, 49. [2] N. Nitta, G. Yushin, Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 2014, 31, 317. [3] X. Su, Q. Wu, J. Li, X. Xiao, A. Lott, W. Lu, B. W. Sheldon, J. Wu, Adv. Energy Mater. 2014, 4, 1300882. [4] D. H. S. Tan, Y.-T. Chen, H. Yang, W. Bao, B. Sreenarayanan, J.-M. Doux, W. Li, B. Lu, S.-Y. Ham, B. Sayahpour et al., Science (N.Y.) 2021, 373, 1494. [5] S. Cangaz, F. Hippauf, F. S. Reuter, S. Doerfler, T. Abendroth, H. Althues, S. Kaskel, Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 2001320. [6] S. Poetke, F. Hippauf, A. Baasner, S. Dörfler, H. Althues, S. Kaskel, Batteries Supercaps 2021, 4, 1323. [7] D. Jantke, R. Bernhard, E. Hanelt, T. Buhrmester, J. Pfeiffer, S. Haufe, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, A3881. [8] S. Poetke, S. Cangaz, F. Hippauf, S. Haufe, S. Dörfler, H. Althues, S. Kaskel, Energy Technol. 2022 submitted.

Investigation and Improvement of the Pressure Control in Si Anode Based Solid-State Batteries

Stack Pressure Enhanced Size Threshold of Si Anode Fracture in All‐Solid‐State Batteries

Stacking pressure homogenizes the electrochemical lithiation reaction of silicon anode in solid-state batteries

A Review on the Features and Progress of Silicon Anodes‐Based Solid‐State Batteries

Monothetic and conductive network and mechanical stress releasing layer on micron-silicon anode enabling high-energy solid-state battery

Development of Si-Based Anodes for All-Solid-State Li-Ion Batteries

Manipulating charge-transfer kinetics and flow-domain LiF-rich interphase to enable high-performance microsized silicon-silver-carbon composite anode for solid-state batteries

Building better solid‐state batteries with silicon‐based anodes

Structural control and optimization schemes of silicon‐based anode materials

A solid-state lithium-ion battery with micron-sized silicon anode operating free from external pressure

Strategies for improving the storage performance of silicon-based anodes in lithium-ion batteries

Unveiling Challenges and Opportunities in Silicon‐Based All‐Solid‐State Batteries: Thin‐Film Bonding with Mismatch Strain

Mixed Electronic-Ionic Conductive Polymer Binder for Silicon-Based Solid-State Battery

Chemo-mechanical failure mechanisms of the silicon anode in solid-state batteries

Solid-State Silicon Anode with Extremely High Initial Coulombic Efficiency

Challenges and opportunities towards silicon-based all-solid-state batteries

Enhancing the Cycle Life of Solid-State Batteries by Restraining the Volume Change of Silicon Anodes

Influence of the Binder properties on Silicon Anode for Solid-State Batteries

Application and Development of Silicon Anode Binders for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Recent Progress in Silicon-Based Materials for Performance-Enhanced Lithium-Ion Batteries

Recent Progress and Challenges in Silicon-Based Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries