Abstract:Background The use of the operating microscope (OM) for extraction and alveolar ridge augmentation (ARP) is increasing due to enhanced magnification and illumination. The primary objective was to compare the wound healing and crestal bone quality after the use of OM and dental loupes (DL) for ARP. Methods Forty non‐molar teeth with periapical lesions in need of extraction and ARP from 33 patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups: DL (control) or OM (test). All procedures were performed by 1 surgeon and assessments done by masked examiners. ARP was performed with an allograft and a resorbable collagen membrane. The presence of granulomatous tissue remnants after debridement was recorded. Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) and ultrasound (US) scans were taken during the healing phase up to 16‐week visits. Bone cores were retrieved from implant osteotomies for histologic analysis. Patient‐reported outcome measurements (PROMs) were assessed. Results All patients completed all study visits except 1 who dropped out before the last visit. After socket debridement, the test group exhibited significantly fewer sites with tissue remnants (p = 0.01) and a better healing score at 2‐week (p = 0.04) and 4‐week (p = 0.01) time points. There were no significant differences in 12‐week crestal bone healing by histology (p = 0.1), US (p = 0.85), and CBCT healing (p = 0.64) at 12 weeks, as well as PROMs (p > 0.1). Conclusion Within the limitation of the study, the use of OM for ARP resulted in significantly fewer tissue remnants and favorable early visual wound healing. CBCT and US‐derived‐crestal bone quality did not show a difference between the 2 groups. Plain Language Summary Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) by placing bone particulates in the extraction socket, covered by a wound dressing material, is commonly applied immediately after tooth extraction to reduce jawbone shrinkage in preparation for implant placement later. The jawbone healing varies, depending largely on the ability to remove the etiology, socket features, extent of surgical trauma, and wound stability. Healed jawbone with good quality is favorable for easiness of implant placement and could be related to maintenance of long‐term implant health. The surgical microscope with high magnification (up to ∼25×) and co‐axial illumination is ideal for assistance in the removal of granulomatous tissue that is believed to interfere with healing, performance of minimally invasive extraction, and stabilization of the wound with meticulous tissue management and fine sutures. This study compared the use of the surgical microscope to dental loupes for ARP in a randomized controlled design. The microscope‐assisted ARP is associated with a significantly higher chance of removing granulomatous tissue, favorable early healing, and similar crestal bone quality. Removal of granulomatous tissue is significant for immediate implant placement. This study serves as a model for testing the benefits of the surgical microscope for encouraging early healing in more challenging intraoral surgical procedures.

Is an Attachable Oral Wound Dressing Effective at Closing an Acute Oroantral Communication?

Effectiveness of Oroantral Communication Closure Using Solid Platelet-Rich Fibrin Compared to a Conventional Treatment Approach: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Platelet-rich fibrin vs. buccal advancement flap for closure of oroantral communications: a prospective clinical study

Closure of Oroantral Communication Using Platelet-rich Fibrin: A Report of Two Cases

Octyl‐2‐cyanoacrylate Tissue Adhesive Closure Versus Subcuticular Suture for Post‐Auricular Incisions

Clinical study on the closure of extraction wounds of partially soft tissue-impacted mandibular third molars

Tissue Adhesive versus Skin Suture plus Waterproof Wound Dressings for Carpal Tunnel Wound Closure: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

The use of absorbable polyglactin/polydioxanon implant (Ethisorb(®)) in non-surgical closure of oro-antral communication

ORal anticoagulation risks late aortic intervention in Conservatively managed type B Aortic dissection (ORCA study)

Use of N-butyl cyanoacrylate with metacryloxisulfolane (glubran 2) surgical glue for flapless closure of oroantral communication

Clinical effectiveness of orange peel polymethoxy-flavonoids rich fraction as a palatal dressing material compared to Alveogyl: randomized clinical trial

Healing of Periodontal Suprabony Defects following Treatment with Open Flap Debridement with or without Hyaluronic Acid (HA) Application

Effect of immediate periodontal surgical treatment on periodontal healing in combined endodontic-periodontal lesions with communication-A randomized clinical trial

Closure of oroantral communications using heterologous biomaterials stabilized by porcine cortical lamina: A case series

Repair of Oroantral Fistulaviamodified Endoscopic Medial Maxillectomy with Free Nasal Mucoperichondrial-Osteal Graft

2-Octyl cyanoacrylate to prevent salivary fistula formation following oral cavity microvascular reconstruction: A prospective trial

Randomized Controlled Trial: Does the Use of Occlusive Hydrocolloid Silver-Containing Wound Dressing after Sternotomy Reduce Surgical Site Infection after Cardiac Surgery?

Healing Outcomes of Open versus Closed Flap Procedures for Collagen Membrane Coverage following Immediate Dental Implant Placements with Simultaneous Guided Tissue Regeneration

The Efficacy of VAMMFT Compared to "Bogota Bag" in Achieving Sheath Closure Following Temporary Abdominal Closure at Index Laparotomy for Trauma

Clinical outcomes of using operating microscope for alveolar ridge preservation: A randomized controlled trial

Comparison of "Semiocclusive Dressing" Treatment Using Plastic Wrap or Low-Adherent Absorbent Wound Dressings Versus Occlusive Dressing Treatment for Stage III/IV Pressure Injuries in the Inflammatory Phase: A Randomized Controlled Trial