The politics of immigration control in Britain and Germany: subnational politicians and social movements.

R. Karapin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422238

Comparative Politics

Abstract:Postwar immigration has caused ethnic minorities to become established in most West European countries, and political backlashes against them have increased in the past few decades. Why does national-level mobilization against immigration develop and sometimes result in more restrictive immigration policies? Theories of immigration control policies have answered these questions largely in terms of economic grievances and national political institutions. By contrast, this article offers a theoretical account of how antiimmigration mobilization grows and influences national policy through the leadership of subnational politicians and social movement organizations. It further argues that their actions are substantially autonomous from socioeconomic factors.' The method used here is a comparison following a most different systems design, in which four cases of immigration restrictions under very different background conditions, in Britain and Germany, are analyzed in order to identify necessary conditions.2 Immigration here refers to the entry into a country of people who are seen as belonging to ethnic groups distinct from the native population and who remain in the receiving country for many years. Antiimmigration mobilization consists of public statements and actions intended to gain political support for policies that will restrict immigration. Policies are restrictive if they intend and achieve reductions in immigration rates relative to previous policies.