Abstract:Data from 307 knee joints of 266 total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients, including 5 categorical and 7 continuous variables, was used for training 8 machine types to predict PCL removal and retention. The best model, LGBM classifier, was selected by AUC method, highlighting insall‐salvati index (ISI), lateral condyle height (LMH), and medial condyle height (MMH) as key variables. Objective Predicting whether the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) should be preserved during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures is a complex task in the preoperative phase. The choice to either retain or excise the PCL has a substantial effect on the surgical outcomes and biomechanical integrity of the knee joint after the operation. To enhance surgeons' ability to predict the removal and retention of the PCL in patients before TKA, we developed machine learning models. We also identified significant feature factors that contribute to accurate predictions during this process. Methods Patients' data on TKA continuously performed by a single surgeon who had intended initially to undergo implantation of cruciate‐retaining (CR) prostheses was collected. During the sacrifice of PCL, we utilized anterior‐stabilized (AS) tibial bearings. The dataset was split into CR and AS categories to form distinct groups. Relevant information regarding age, gender, body mass index (BMI), the affected side, and preoperative diagnosis was extracted by reviewing the medical records of the patients. To ensure the authenticity of the research, an initial step involved capturing X‐ray images before the surgery. These images were then analyzed to determine the height of the medial condyle (MMH) and lateral condyle (LMH), as well as the ratios between MLW and MMH and MLW and LMH. Additionally, the insall‐salvati index (ISI) was calculated, and the severity of any varus or valgus deformities was assessed. Eight machine‐learning methods were developed to predict the retention of PCL in TKA. Risk factor analysis was performed using the SHApley Additive exPlanations method. Results A total of 307 knee joints from 266 patients were included, among which there were 254 females and 53 males. A stratified random sampling technique was used to split patients in a 70:30 ratio into a training dataset and a testing dataset. Eight machine‐learning models were trained using data feeding. Except for the AUC of the LGBM Classifier, which is 0.70, the AUCs of other machine learning models are all lower than 0.70. In importance‐based analysis, ISI, MMH, LMH, deformity, and age were confirmed as important predictive factors for PCL retention in operations. Conclusion The LGBM Classifier model achieved the best performance in predicting PCL retention in TKA. Among the potential risk factors, ISI, MMH, LMH, and deformity played essential roles in the prediction of PCL retention.

A multiview deep learning‐based prediction pipeline augmented with confident learning can improve performance in determining knee arthroplasty candidates

A Systematic Approach to Predicting the Risk of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Revision.

Deep Learning Predicts Total Knee Replacement from Magnetic Resonance Images

Preoperative Prediction of Prosthetic Size in Total Knee Arthroplasty Based on Multimodal Data and Deep Learning

Development and Validation of a Deep-Learning Model to Predict Total Hip Replacement on Radiographs

Use of natural language processing techniques to predict patient selection for total hip and knee arthroplasty from radiology reports

Predicting the Risk of Total Hip Replacement by Using A Deep Learning Algorithm on Plain Pelvic Radiographs: Diagnostic Study

Development of an artificial intelligence model for predicting implant size in total knee arthroplasty using simple X-ray images

Deep Learning for Automatic Knee Osteoarthritis Severity Grading and Classification

Clinical validation of a deep learning-based approach for preoperative decision-making in implant size for total knee arthroplasty

Deep Learning Approach for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Lesion Detection: Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance Using Arthroscopy as the Reference Standard

Identifying who are unlikely to benefit from total knee arthroplasty using machine learning models

Deep Learning for Predicting Progression of Patellofemoral Osteoarthritis Based on Lateral Knee Radiographs, Demographic Data and Symptomatic Assessments

Developing a Machine‐Learning Predictive Model for Retention of Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Lower Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis Risk After Knee/Hip Arthroplasty

Prediction of Knee Prosthesis Using Patient Gender and BMI With Non-marked X-Ray by Deep Learning

USE OF NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES TO PREDICT PATIENT SELECTION FOR TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY: RESULTS FROM THE AI TO REVOLUTIONISE THE PATIENT CARE PATHWAY IN HIP AND KNEE ARTHROPLASTY (ARCHERY) PROJECT

Reliable prediction of implant size and axial alignment in AI-based 3D preoperative planning for total knee arthroplasty

DeepKOA: a deep-learning model for predicting progression in knee osteoarthritis using multimodal magnetic resonance images from the osteoarthritis initiative

Deep learning-based multimodal image analysis predicts bone cement leakage during percutaneous kyphoplasty: protocol for model development, and validation by prospective and external datasets

Machine learning model outperforms the ACS Risk Calculator in predicting non‐home discharge following primary total knee arthroplasty