Abstract:Purpose. To establish the peculiarities of the accumulation and removal of macroelements by sugar beet in the Steppe Zone of Ukraine. Methods. Field research was conducted during 2020–2022 in the Chkalov Agrocompany LLC (Kirovohrad region). The scheme of the experiment provided for the cultivation of sugar beets against the background of the use of a water-retaining agent (without hydrogel; hydrogel Aquasorb, 300 kg/ha), under different systems of the main fertilizer [without fertilizers – control; manure, 20 t/ha; N170P180K350; Leonardyt, 400 kg/ha; Parostok (brand 20), 400 kg/ha] and foliar feeding during the growing season (without foliar feeding; Humifild, SE, 2 kg/ha in the BBCH stage 30 + 39). Organic and mineral fertilizers (PK) were applied in autumn at plowing and nitrogen at cultivation in early spring. The adsorbent was applied to the soil two weeks before sowing the crop locally in the zone of the row, based on the data of the GPS tracker. The rest of the agricultural activities corresponded to the generally accepted culture cultivation technology in the research area. Results. On average, according to the experiment, sugar beet used 90.2 kg/ha of nitrogen, 15.1 kg/ha of phosphorus, and 75.6 kg/ha of potassium to form a crop. The consumption of macronutrients for the formation of humus was not calculated, since it was immediately returned to the soil during harvesting. The use of organic fertilizers of the new formulation contributed not only to the formation of a high yield of sugar beet roots, but also to a significant removal of macronutrients from the soil. In particular, when applying Leonardyt (400 kg/ha) with the crop, 94.8 kg/ha of nitrogen, 16.1 kg/ha of phosphorus and 79.9 kg/ha of potassium was removed, which is 17.1; 3.1 and 14.7 kg/ha more than on the unfertilized control. When applying Parostok (brand 20) (400 kg/ha), 101.6 kg/ha of nitrogen, 16.7 kg/ha of phosphorus and 84.2 kg/ha of potassium was removed, which exceeded the control indicators by 23.9; 3.8 and 19.1 kg/ha, respectively. Conclusions. According to the indicators of the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm) of photosynthesis, the highest coefficient values were obtained in the case of applying Aquasorb hydrogel in the zone of the row before sowing and fertilizing with Leonardyt (0.58–0.59) and Parostok (brand 20) (0.58–0.60). Therefore, the best conditions for the growth and development of sugar beets were formed in these treatments of the experiment. Based on the obtained coefficients of the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence (Fv/Fm) of photosynthesis, the yield of root crops can be predicted by the equation y = 88.5x + 5.1.

Prevention of the development of root on stage of post-harvest storage of sugar beet

Problems of seasonality of sugar production from beets

Sugar beet root susceptibility to storage rots and downregulation of plant defense genes increases with time in storage

Molecular Mechanisms Through Which Short-Term Cold Storage Improves the Nutritional Quality and Sensory Characteristics of Postharvest Sweet Potato Tuberous Roots: A Transcriptomic Study

Root Microbiome and Metabolome Traits Associated with Improved Post-Harvest Root Storage for Sugar Beet Breeding Lines Under Southern Idaho Conditions

THE PROBLEM OF SUGAR BEET CYST NEMATODES IN MODERN CONDITIONS OF MACROECONOMIC AND CLIMATIC CHALLENGES

Cercospora leaf spot impacts on postharvest disease and respiration of affected sugarbeet roots

Radiographic method for assessing the quality of sugar beet seeds

Risk assessment of frost damage to sugar beet simulated under cold and semi-arid environments

Cold-Triggered Induction of ROS- and Raffinose Metabolism in Freezing-Sensitive Taproot Tissue of Sugar Beet

Transcriptomic and metabolomic changes in postharvest sugarbeet roots reveal widespread metabolic changes in storage and identify genes potentially responsible for respiratory sucrose loss

Integrative transcriptomics reveals genotypic impact on sugar beet storability

Assessment of nutrient uptake by sugar beet as a factor of the crop biological potential realization

The impact of wounding and postharvest storage conditions on retention of soluble protein in sugar beet leaves

Cold-triggered induction of ROS- and raffinose-related metabolism in freezing-sensitive taproot tissue of sugar beet

Disease Incidence in Sugar Beet Fields Is Correlated with Microbial Diversity and Distinct Biological Markers

Optical sensors to predict sugarbeet yield, quality, and fertilizer nitrogen application rate

Glycolysis Is Dynamic and Relates Closely to Respiration Rate in Stored Sugarbeet Roots

Comparative proteomic analysis of two contrasting cultivars reveals the mechanism of sugar beet response to freezing stress

Effect of Vibration Stress on Selected Chemical Parameters of "Bluecrop" Highbush Blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) and Grape (Vitis vinifera L.)

Regulation of photosynthetic function and reactive oxygen species metabolism in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars under waterlogging stress and associated tolerance mechanisms