CaRE@ELLICSR: Effects of a clinically integrated, group‐based, multidimensional cancer rehabilitation program

Christian J. Lopez,Daniel Santa Mina,Victoria Tan,Manjula Maganti,Cheryl Pritlove,Lori J. Bernstein,David M. Langelier,Eugene Chang,Jennifer M. Jones,Daniel Santa Mina

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.7009

IF: 4.711

2024-03-10

Cancer Medicine

Abstract:Background Although oncology clinical practice guidelines recognize the need and benefits of exercise, the implementation of these services into cancer care delivery remains limited. We developed and evaluated the impact of a clinically integrated 8‐week exercise and education program (CaRE@ELLICSR). Methods We conducted a mixed methods, prospective cohort study to examine the effects of the program. Each week, participants attended a 1‐h exercise class, followed by a 1.5‐h education session. Questionnaires, 6‐min walk tests (6MWT), and grip strength were completed at baseline (T0), 8 weeks (T1), and 20 weeks (T2). Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with a sub‐sample of participants about their experience with the program. Results Between September 2017 and February 2020, 277 patients enrolled in the program and 210 consented to participate in the research study. The mean age of participants was 55 years. Participants were mostly female (78%), white/Caucasian (55%) and half had breast cancer (50%). Participants experienced statistical and clinically meaninful improvements from T0 to T1 in disability, 6MWT, grip strength, physical activity, and several cancer‐related symptoms. These outcomes were maintained 3 months after program completion (T2). Qualitative interviews supported these findings and three themes emerged from the interviews: (1) empowerment and control, (2) supervision and internal program support, and (3) external program support. Conclusions This study demonstrates the impact of overcoming common organizational barriers to deliver exercise and rehabilitation as part of routine care. CaRE@ELLICSR demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in patient‐reported and functional outcomes and was considered beneficial and important by participants for their recovery and wellbeing.

oncology