Abstract:This study investigated the nature of the underlying working memory system supporting sentence processing through examining individual differences in sensitivity to retrieval interference effects during sentence comprehension. Interference effects occur when readers incorrectly retrieve sentence constituents which are similar to those required during integrative processes. We examined interference arising from a partial match between distracting constituents and syntactic and semantic cues, and related these interference effects to performance on working memory, short-term memory (STM), vocabulary, and executive function tasks. For online sentence comprehension, as measured by self-paced reading, the magnitude of individuals' syntactic interference effects was predicted by general WM capacity and the relation remained significant when partialling out vocabulary, indicating that the effects were not due to verbal knowledge. For offline sentence comprehension, as measured by responses to comprehension questions, both general WM capacity and vocabulary knowledge interacted with semantic interference for comprehension accuracy, suggesting that both general WM capacity and the quality of semantic representations played a role in determining how well interference was resolved offline. For comprehension question reaction times, a measure of semantic STM capacity interacted with semantic but not syntactic interference. However, a measure of phonological capacity (digit span) and a general measure of resistance to response interference (Stroop effect) did not predict individuals' interference resolution abilities in either online or offline sentence comprehension. The results are discussed in relation to the multiple capacities account of working memory (e.g., Martin and Romani, 1994; Martin and He, 2004), and the cue-based retrieval parsing approach (e.g., Lewis et al., 2006; Van Dyke et al., 2014). While neither approach was fully supported, a possible means of reconciling the two approaches and directions for future research are proposed.

Crosslinguistic evidence against interference from extra-sentential distractors

Syntactic and semantic interference in sentence comprehension: Support from English and German eye-tracking data

Encoding and Retrieval Interference in Sentence Comprehension: Evidence from Agreement

Semantic and Syntactic Interference in Sentence Comprehension: A Comparison of Working Memory Models

Verbal interference paradigms: A systematic review investigating the role of language in cognition

Dependency Distance Differences Across Interpreting Types: Implications for Cognitive Demand

The effects of sentence length on dependency distance, dependency direction and the implications–Based on a parallel English–Chinese dependency treebank

Distance-invoked Difficulty As a Trigger for Errors in Chinese and Japanese EFL Learners' English Writings

Effects of Syntactic Distance and Word Order on Language Processing: an Investigation Based on a Psycholinguistic Treebank of English

The role of domain-general frontal systems in language comprehension: evidence from dual-task interference and semantic ambiguity

Cross-Lingual Transfer of Cognitive Processing Complexity

The Interaction of Linguistic and Visual Cues for the Processing of Case in Russian by Russian‐German Bilinguals: An Eye Tracking Study

A Language Model with Limited Memory Capacity Captures Interference in Human Sentence Processing

Agreement attraction in grammatical sentences and the role of the task

Discourse-based constraints on long-distance dependencies generalize across constructions in English and French

Neurophysiology of Hungarian subject-verb dependencies with varying intervening complexity

Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: the role of working memory

What did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian metaanalysis

Multiple constraints on semantic integration in a hierarchical structure: ERP evidence from German

A Matter of Memory? Age‐Invariant Relative Clause Disambiguation and Memory Interference in Older Adults

Evidence of a metacognitive illusion in stimulus-specific prospective judgments of distraction by background speech