Abstract:Undergraduate quantum mechanics focuses on teaching through a wavefunction approach in the position-space representation. This leads to a differential equation perspective for teaching the material. However, we know that abstract representation-independent approaches often work better with students, by comparing student reactions to learning the series solution of the harmonic oscillator versus the abstract operator method. Because one can teach all of the solvable quantum problems using a similar abstract method, it brings up the question, which is likely to lead to a better student understanding? In work at Georgetown University and with edX, we have been teaching a class focused on an operator-forward viewpoint, which we like to call operator mechanics. It teaches quantum mechanics in a representation-independent fashion and allows for most of the math to be algebraic, rather than based on differential equations. It relies on four fundamental operator identities -- (i) the Leibniz rule for commutators; (ii) the Hadamard lemma; (iii) the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula; and (iv) the exponential disentangling identity. These identities allow one to solve eigenvalues, eigenstates and wavefunctions for all analytically solvable problems (including some not often included in undergraduate curricula, such as the Morse potential or the Poschl-Teller potential). It also allows for more advanced concepts relevant for quantum sensing, such as squeezed states, to be introduced in a simpler format than is conventionally done. In this paper, we illustrate the three approaches of matrix mechanics, wave mechanics, and operator mechanics, we show how one organizes a class in this new format, we summarize the experiences we have had with teaching quantum mechanics in this fashion and we describe how it allows us to focus the quantum curriculum on more modern 21st century topics appropriate for the

Active learning in a graduate quantum field theory course

Implementation and goals of quantum optics experiments in undergraduate instructional labs

Let Students Take the Wheel: Introducing Post-Quantum Cryptography with Active Learning

A Course chapter on Quantum Computing for Master Students in Engineering

Teaching Quantum Computing to High School Students

Experience in teaching quantum computing with hands-on programming labs

Teaching Quantum Computing through a Practical Software-driven Approach: Experience Report

Active Learning in Physics: From 101, to Progress, and Perspective

Transforming a 4th year Modern Optics Course Using a Deliberate Practice Framework

Education for expanding the quantum workforce: Student perceptions of the quantum industry in an upper-division physics capstone course

Teaching quantum computing with an interactive textbook

Quantum interactive learning tutorial on the double-slit experiment to improve student understanding of quantum physics

‘Learning by doing’: a teaching method for active learning in scientific graduate education

Virtual Learning Environment for Interactive Engagement with Advanced Quantum Mechanics

Building Engineering Fundamentals in an Active Learning Environment

Should we trade off higher-level mathematics for abstraction to improve student understanding of quantum mechanics?

Teaching quantum mechanics to over 14,000 nonscientists

Quantum Computing for All: Online Courses Built Around an Interactive Visual Quantum Circuit Simulator

Physics-Informed Active Learning for Accelerating Quantum Chemical Simulations

Quantum Computing for All: Online Courses Built Around Interactive Visual Quantum Circuit Simulator

Developing Peer Instruction questions for quantitative problems for an upper-division astronomy course