Abstract:Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Atrial and ventricular functional tricuspid regurgitation (A-FTR and V-FTR) have recently emerged as different phenotypes of FTR. Given the difference in mechanisms that are postulated to be underlying these 2 entities, a different remodeling of tricuspid valve (TV) apparatus can occur and therefore also a specific quantitative approach could be deemed. Aim Aim of this study was to investigate the TV apparatus remodeling in the two different phenotypes of FTR: ventricular (V-FTR) and atrial (A-FTR) and the role of echocardiographic parameters of TV remodeling and TR severity to predict clinical outcomes. Material and methods The present retrospective study included consecutive patients with moderate to severe functional tricuspid regurgitation (FTR) referred for echocardiography in two Italian centers. The composite endpoint of death for any cause and heart failure (HF) hospitalization was used as primary outcome of this analysis. According to more recent guidelines, patients were considered having A-FTR if having history of long- standing atrial fibrillation, without history of pulmonary hypertension and left side heart disease. Results. A total of 180 patients were included. Despite the right atrial volume (RAV) was not different in the 2 groups, in A-FTR tethering height was significantly lower (11.7 ±4.8 mm vs 15.0 ± 5.5 in V-FTR. p <0.01) and the 3D-derived tricuspid annulus (TA) diameters were larger both in end-diastolic and mid-systolic phase (3D-TA-End diastolic- major axis: 45.2 ± 6.2 mm in A-FTR vs 42.8 ± 5.4 in V-FTR. p= 0.04; 3D-TA mid systolic major axis: 41,7 ± 6,4mm in A-FTR vs 37,9 ± 5,1 in V-FTR, P <0,01). 3D-TA-End diastolic- minor axis: 39.7 ± 6.8 vs 37.1 ± 5.2. p= 0.03). Regarding the parameters of severity of FTR. patients with V-FTR had larger vena contracta (VC). either when 2D estimated or 3D (2D-VC-average: 5.3 ± 2.8 mm in A-FTR vs 6.6 ± 3.7 in V-FTR. P= 0.02; 3D-VCA: 0.9 ± 0.4 cm2 vs 1.3 ± 1.1 cm2 p= 0.02); conversely the value of 2D-ERO and regurgitant volume estimated with 2D-PISA method did not show significant difference between the 2 groups (table 1). After a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR: 2-48) 72 patients (40%) reached the primary end-point and 64 (36%) hospitalized for HF. Different predictors of combined end point were found in the 2 groups: tenting height. 2D-VC. 3D-VCA and regurgitant fraction were prognostic correlates in V-FTR; TA dimensions as well as all the parameters of severe TR. including EROA with PISA method were related to the prognosis in A-FTR (table 2). Conclusions Prognostic role of quantitative parameters of FTR in A-FTR and V-FTR is different, thus reaffirming the difference in underlying pathogenic mechanisms and the needing for a more specific diagnostic approach and prognostic stratification in these two FTR phenotypes

Three-dimensional analysis of the tricuspid annular geometry in healthy subjects and in patients with different grades of functional tricuspid regurgitation

Tricuspid Annulus Dilation in Patients with Combined Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation and Left-Heart Valvular Disease: Does Septal Annulus Not Dilate?

Tricuspid valve geometry alterations in different aetiologies of functional regurgitation: 3D echocardiography study

Application of Real-Time Three-Dimensional Transesphaogeal Echocardiography in Quantitation of Tricuspid Valve Annulus Diameter

Preoperative Predictors of Recurrent Tricuspid Regurgitation After Annuloplasty: Insights into the Role of 3D Echocardiography

Assessment of normal tricuspid valve anatomy in adults by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography

Comprehensive Dynamic 3-Dimensional Analysis of Tricuspid Valve in Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: Implications for Prophylactic Tricuspid Valve Intervention

Three-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography for Semiautomated Analysis of the Tricuspid Annulus: Validation and Normal Values

Evaluation of a Novel Echocardiographic Three-Dimensional Automated Software for the Assessment of the Aortic Root in Candidates for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Changes in Tricuspid Annular Geometry in Patients with Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation

Tricuspid regurgitation in rheumatic heart valve disease. New insights from 3D transthoracic echocardiography

Comparison between multimodality imaging approaches for measurement of the tricuspid annulus in severe tricuspid regurgitation

Evaluation of morphological and structure parameters of tricuspid in patients with functional tricuspid regurgitation using real-time three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography

Comparison of different imaging modalities for the quantification of tricuspid valve geometry and regurgitation: a retrospective, single‐center study

Predictive factors for recurrent tricuspid regurgitation after tricuspid annuloplasty: 3D echocardiography study

Quantification of tricuspid regurgitation area by 3‐dimensional color Doppler echocardiography considering different clinical settings

The Normal Tricuspid Valve

Prognostic value of three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of tricuspid valve geometry and parameters of severity in atrial and ventricular functional tricuspid regurgitation

Three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of annular shape changes in the normal and regurgitant mitral valve

Level of agreement between three-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography for mitral annulus evaluation: A feasibility and comparison study

Three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic evaluation of tricuspid regurgitation severity using proximal isovelocity surface area: comparison with volumetric method