Abstract:Objectives: Three-dimensional (3D) technology is increasingly applied in the surgical treatment of distal radial fractures and may optimize surgical planning, improve fracture reduction, facilitate implant and screw positioning, and thus prevent surgical complications. The main research questions of this review were as follows: (1) "How do 3D-assisted versus 2D-assisted distal radius fracture surgery compare in terms of intraoperative metrics (i.e., operation time and fluoroscopy frequency)?", and (2) "What are the effects of 3D-assisted versus 2D-assisted surgery on postoperative outcomes (patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), range of motion (ROM), fracture reduction, complication rate, and screw placement accuracy)?" Methods: This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) guidelines. In total, 873 articles were found between 1 January 2010 and 1 April 2024, of which 12 (718 patients) were suitable for inclusion. The quality of the studies, assessed using the McMaster quality assessment, ranged from moderate to excellent, although the surgical techniques and outcome measures varied widely. Articles comparing a 3D group to a 2D group (conventional imaging) and reporting on primary or secondary outcomes were included in the analysis, for which weighted means and ranges were calculated. Results: Three different concepts of 3D-assisted surgery techniques were identified: (1) 3D virtual surgical planning (VSP), (2) 3D-printed handheld models, and (3) 3D intraoperative guides. Differences between 3D-assisted and conventional 2D-assisted surgery were evaluated. Regarding intraoperative metrics, 3D-assisted surgery significantly reduced operation time by 6 min (weighted mean 66.9 versus 73.2 min) and reduced the fluoroscopy frequency by 1.1 images (5.8 versus 4.7 times). Regarding postoperative outcomes, the weighted mean of the DASH score differed between the 3D- and 2D-assisted groups (17.8 versus 23.9 points), and no differences in PRWE or VAS score were found. Furthermore, our results showed no significant differences in the ROM and fracture reduction parameters. In terms of complications, the application of 3D-assisted surgery decreased the complication rate from 10.7% to 3.6%, and the use of screws with appropriate lengths improved from 75% to 86%. Conclusions: Applications of 3D-assisted surgery in distal radial fracture surgery can slightly reduce the operation time and fluoroscopy frequency. Evidence for the improvement of fracture reduction and functional outcomes is still lacking, although it likely reduces the complication rate and improves the use of appropriate screw lengths.

3D-assisted corrective osteotomies of the distal radius: a comparison of pre-contoured conventional implants versus patient-specific implants

Accuracy of dental implant surgery with robotic position feedback and registration algorithm: An <i>in</i>-<i>vitro</i> study

A 3D printed cast for minimally invasive transfer of distal radius osteotomy: a cadaver study

A Systematic Review in 718 Patients

Development of patient-specific osteosynthesis including 3D-printed drilling guides for medial tibial plateau fracture surgery

It is safe to use the ulnar length difference to correct the radial length difference in the 3D-planning process of a radius osteotomy in patients with a distal radius malunion

Pre-operative virtual three-dimensional planning for proximal humerus fractures: A proof-of-concept study

Does 3D-assisted surgery of tibial plateau fractures improve surgical and patient outcome? A systematic review of 1074 patients

A novel patient-specific 3D printed guide for accurate femoral derotation osteotomies: a case report

Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of Robot-Guided Laser Osteotomy in Reconstruction with Patient-Specific Implants—An Accuracy Study of Digital High-Tech Procedures

Intra-Articular Corrective Osteotomy for Distal Radial Intra-Articular Malunion Using Patient-Matched Instruments: A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial

Customized orbital implant versus 3D preformed titanium mesh for orbital fracture repair: A retrospective comparative analysis of orbital reconstruction accuracy

Accuracy of intertrochanteric osteotomy for patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis operated with 3D printed patient-specific guides

Novel 3D-Printed Patient Specific Instrumentation to Guide Curved Intra-Articular Osteotomies for Tibial Plateau Malunions

A case report demonstrating the utilization of computer-aided design technology and intramedullary nails for the management of femoral deformity and fracture

Use of three-dimensional technology for complications of upper limb fracture treatment

3D Printing and Computer-Aided Design for Precision Osteotomy-Aided Modules in Bone Biomechanical Study

Patient-Specific Guides for Accurate and Precise Positioning of Osseointegrated Implants in Transfemoral Amputations: A Proof-of-Concept In Vitro Study

Computer-assisted open reduction internal fixation of intraarticular radius fractures navigated with patient-specific instrumentation, a prospective case series

Comparing the Accuracy of Patient-Specific Guide and Universal Guide for Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Dogs

Intraoperative Three-Dimensional Imaging in Calcaneal Fracture Treatment