The Effects of Sampling-Site Intervals on Fish Species Richness in Wadeable Rivers: A Case Study from Taizi River Basin, Northeastern China

Mingqiao Yu,Zhao Li,Qian Zhao,Sen Ding

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/d16060330

2024-06-04

Diversity

Abstract:Fish play an important role in river ecosystems, and the conservation of their diversity is a common goal worldwide. It is still unclear how fish monitoring programs should be developed in order to rationalize the monitoring of fish diversity in rivers. To help address this issue, we conducted a comparative study of fish species richness obtained through three site-interval monitoring programs (SS1: 3 km interval scheme; SS2: 6 km interval scheme; SS3: 9 km interval scheme) in wadeable rivers in northeastern China. Here, a total of 18 fish species and 4 rare species were collected from 3 rivers. The cumulative species-richness curves showed that SS1 had the highest species richness in a single river and in the whole region, and the species richness gradually decreased with increasing site intervals. The results of the cumulative percentage of species richness indicated that SS1 and SS2 could achieve a level of 80% of potential species richness, while only SS1 could achieve a level of 90% of potential species richness in the Lanhe River (where no rare species were present). However, the results of cumulative species richness per unit of effort indicated that SS2 and SS3 had higher input-output benefits. These results suggested that rare species were more susceptible to monitoring programs and that SS2 was more advantageous in terms of obtaining species richness and cost-effectiveness. This study provides a reliable reference for river fish-monitoring program development.

ecology,biodiversity conservation

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to determine the impact of different sampling schemes (i.e., sampling points at different distance intervals) on fish species richness in wadable rivers. Specifically, the study aims to:

1. **Evaluate the impact of different sampling schemes on fish species richness**: By comparing three different sampling interval schemes (SS1: 3 - kilometer interval; SS2: 6 - kilometer interval; SS3: 9 - kilometer interval), study the changes in fish species richness at the river and regional scales.

2. **Assess the impact of different sampling schemes on the collection efficiency of rare species**: Rare species are very important for biological assessment and conservation work, but due to their discontinuous distribution, different sampling schemes may have different collection efficiencies for rare species.

3. **Identify an efficient sampling scheme**: Find a sampling scheme that can achieve the expected species - richness target at a reasonable cost. The study hypothesizes that the minimum sampling interval (i.e., the maximum number of sampling points) helps to achieve the target of fish species richness, and does not necessarily require high catch - per - unit - effort.

### Research Background

Fish species richness is an important part of assessing the health of river ecosystems and biodiversity conservation. However, it is currently unclear how to design fish monitoring schemes to reasonably monitor fish diversity in rivers. Therefore, this study provides a scientific basis for formulating reasonable fish monitoring schemes by comparing the effects of different sampling interval schemes.

### Main Findings

- **The relationship between species richness and sampling interval**: SS1 (3 - kilometer interval) has the highest species richness in a single river and the entire region, and as the sampling - point interval increases, the species richness gradually decreases.

- **The sensitivity of rare species**: Rare species are more sensitive to monitoring schemes, and SS1 shows higher efficiency in collecting rare species.

- **Cost - benefit analysis**: Although SS1 performs best in terms of species richness, SS2 and SS3 have higher cumulative species richness per unit effort, indicating that in some cases, a larger sampling interval may be more cost - effective.

### Conclusion

The results of this study provide a reliable reference for the optimization of river fish monitoring schemes. In particular, when considering the protection of rare species, a smaller sampling interval should be preferentially selected to improve species collection efficiency. At the same time, in the case of limited resources, a sampling scheme with a larger interval can be considered to balance cost and effect.