Abstract:Deep neural network (DNN) accelerators overcome the power and memory walls for executing neural-net models locally on edge-computing devices to support sophisticated AI applications. The advocacy of “model once, run optimized anywhere” paradigm introduces potential new security threat to edge intelligence that is methodologically different from the well-known adversarial examples. Existing adversarial examples modify the input samples presented to an AI application either digitally or physically to cause a misclassification. Nevertheless, these input-based perturbations are not robust or surreptitious on multi-view target. To generate a good adversarial example for misclassifying a real-world target of variational viewing angle, lighting and distance, a decent number of target’s samples are required to extract the rare anomalies that can cross the decision boundary. The feasible perturbations are substantial and visually perceptible. In this paper, we propose a new glitch injection attack on DNN accelerator that is capable of misclassifying a target under variational viewpoints. The glitches injected into the computation clock signal induce transitory but disruptive errors in the intermediate results of the multiply-and-accumulate (MAC) operations. The attack pattern for each target of interest consists of sparse instantaneous glitches, which can be derived from just one sample of the target. Two modes of attack patterns are derived, and their effectiveness are demonstrated on four representative ImageNet models implemented on the Deep-learning Processing Unit (DPU) of FPGA edge and its DNN development toolchain. The attack success rates are evaluated on 118 objects in 61 diverse sensing conditions, including 25 viewing angles (−60° to 60°), 24 illumination directions and 12 color temperatures. In the covert mode, the success rates of our attack exceed existing stealthy adversarial examples by more than 16.3%, with only two glitches injected into ten thousands to a million cycles for one complete inference. In the robust mode, the attack success rates on all four DNNs are more than 96.2% with an average glitch intensity of 1.4% and a maximum glitch intensity of 10.2%.

I Know What You See: Power Side-Channel Attack on Convolutional Neural Network Accelerators

The Secret Revealer: Generative Model-Inversion Attacks Against Deep Neural Networks

PowerGAN: A Machine Learning Approach for Power Side-Channel Attack on Compute-in-Memory Accelerators

Stealthy and Robust Glitch Injection Attack on Deep Learning Accelerator for Target with Variational Viewpoint.

Power Side-Channel Attacks on BNN Accelerators in Remote FPGAs

Imperceptible Misclassification Attack on Deep Learning Accelerator by Glitch Injection

DeepEM: Deep Neural Networks Model Recovery through EM Side-Channel Information Leakage

Reverse engineering convolutional neural networks through side-channel information leaks

Power side-channel leakage localization through adversarial training of deep neural networks

Private Image Reconstruction from System Side Channels Using Generative Models

Defense against ML-based Power Side-channel Attacks on DNN Accelerators with Adversarial Attacks

DeepTheft: Stealing DNN Model Architectures through Power Side Channel

Stealing Neural Network Structure Through Remote FPGA Side-Channel Analysis

Revealing CNN Architectures via Side-Channel Analysis in Dataflow-based Inference Accelerators

Leaky DNN: Stealing Deep-Learning Model Secret with GPU Context-Switching Side-Channel

CSI Neural Network: Using Side-channels to Recover Your Artificial Neural Network Information

On Reverse Engineering Neural Network Implementation on GPU

Open DNN Box by Power Side-Channel Attack

NNLeak: An AI-Oriented DNN Model Extraction Attack through Multi-Stage Side Channel Analysis

RE-Specter: Examining the Architectural Features of Configurable CNN with Power Side-Channel

Mercury: An Automated Remote Side-channel Attack to Nvidia Deep Learning Accelerator