Pain, gastrointestinal function and fertility outcomes of modified nerve‐vessel sparing segmental and full thickness discoid resection for deep colorectal endometriosis – A prospective cohort study

Gernot Hudelist,Daria Pashkunova,Ezgi Darici,Anna Rath,Johanna Mitrowitz,Bernhard Dauser,Birgit Senft,Attila Bokor
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14676
2023-09-13
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Abstract:In patients with symptomatic colorectal deep endometriosis, both nerve‐vessel sparing segmental resection (NVSSR) and full thickness discoid resection (FTDR) result in considerable improvements in gastrointestinal function, as measured by decreased lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS) symptoms and increased gastrointestinal function‐related quality of life scores, with no differences in postsurgical function between the two techniques. Both techniques have comparable rates of complications, effects on pain relief and health profiles. Introduction There is an ongoing debate on surgical techniques for colorectal deep endometriosis (DE) and their effects on gastrointestinal (GI) function. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the differences in pre‐ and postsurgical GI function, health profiles and pain symptoms in women undergoing colorectal surgery for symptomatic DE either with a modified segmental resection technique, so‐called nerve‐vessel sparing segmental resection (NVSSR), or full thickness discoid resection (FTDR). Complication rates and fertility outcomes were also evaluated. Material and methods A total of 162 consecutive patients, 125 (77.2%) of whom underwent NVSSR and 37 (22.8%) FTDR, were evaluated regarding complication rates. Furthermore a lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS) scores, gastrointestinal function‐related quality of life index (GIQLI), pain symptoms, endometriosis health profile (EHP‐30) parameters were analyzed pre‐ and post‐surgery in a final cohort of 121 patients. Results There was no difference between postsurgical prevalence of LARS in either surgery group (14/98, 14.1% NVSSR; 2/23, 8.6% FTDR), with significantly decreased LARS scores and increased GIQLI values before vs after surgery in both groups (P
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?