Abstract:We synthesized the vast, contradictory scholarly literature on gender bias in academic science from 2000 to 2020. In the most prestigious journals and media outlets, which influence many people’s opinions about sexism, bias is frequently portrayed as an omnipresent factor limiting women’s progress in the tenure-track academy. Claims and counterclaims regarding the presence or absence of sexism span a range of evaluation contexts. Our approach relied on a combination of meta-analysis and analytic dissection. We evaluated the empirical evidence for gender bias in six key contexts in the tenure-track academy: (a) tenure-track hiring, (b) grant funding, (c) teaching ratings, (d) journal acceptances, (e) salaries, and (f) recommendation letters. We also explored the gender gap in a seventh area, journal productivity, because it can moderate bias in other contexts. We focused on these specific domains, in which sexism has most often been alleged to be pervasive, because they represent important types of evaluation, and the extensive research corpus within these domains provides sufficient quantitative data for comprehensive analysis. Contrary to the omnipresent claims of sexism in these domains appearing in top journals and the media, our findings show that tenure-track women are at parity with tenure-track men in three domains (grant funding, journal acceptances, and recommendation letters) and are advantaged over men in a fourth domain (hiring). For teaching ratings and salaries, we found evidence of bias against women; although gender gaps in salary were much smaller than often claimed, they were nevertheless concerning. Even in the four domains in which we failed to find evidence of sexism disadvantaging women, we nevertheless acknowledge that broad societal structural factors may still impede women’s advancement in academic science. Given the substantial resources directed toward reducing gender bias in academic science, it is imperative to develop a clear understanding of when and where such efforts are justified and of how resources can best be directed to mitigate sexism when and where it exists.

An annotated bibliography of work related to gender in science

Addressing the underrepresentation of women in mathematics conferences

The Effect of Gender in the Publication Patterns in Mathematics

A source list to support DEI/EDI work in mathematical sciences

Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration

Gender differences in research areas and topics: An analysis of publications in 285 fields

The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists

Assessing Gender Bias in the Information Systems Field: An Analysis of the Impact on Citations

Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields

Biases in gendered citation practices: an exploratory study and some reflections on the Matthew and Matilda effects

The Mathematics of Mathematics: Using Mathematics and Data Science to Analyze the Mathematical Sciences Community and Enhance Social Justice

Gender (Im)balance in Citation Practices in Cognitive Neuroscience

Gender, culture, and mathematics performance

Women's Representation in Mathematics Subfields: Evidence from the arXiv

Gender Gaps in the Mathematical Sciences: The Creativity Factor

Twenty Female Mathematicians

Studies of the aberrant eumenine wasp,Xenorhynchium nitidulum (Fabr.)

An Empirical Analysis of the Gender Gap in Mathematics

Five years of Stem Cell Research--reflections on progress in the field.

Revisiting Male Allies in Mathematics and Physics Throughout History: Role Models for Men in STEM Education

The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education