Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder differs from anorexia nervosa in delay discounting
Casey M. Stern,Iman McPherson,Melissa J. Dreier,Kathryn Coniglio,Lilian P. Palmer,Julia Gydus,Haley Graver,Laura T. Germine,Nassim Tabri,Shirley B. Wang,Lauren Breithaupt,Kamryn T. Eddy,Jennifer J. Thomas,Franziska Plessow,Kendra R. Becker
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00958-x
2024-01-31
Journal of Eating Disorders
Abstract:Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) and anorexia nervosa (AN) are the two primary restrictive eating disorders; however, they are driven by differing motives for inadequate dietary intake. Despite overlap in restrictive eating behaviors and subsequent malnutrition, it remains unknown if ARFID and AN also share commonalities in their cognitive profiles, with cognitive alterations being a key identifier of AN. Discounting the present value of future outcomes with increasing delay to their expected receipt represents a core cognitive process guiding human decision-making. A hallmark cognitive characteristic of individuals with AN (vs. healthy controls [HC]) is reduced discounting of future outcomes, resulting in reduced impulsivity and higher likelihood of favoring delayed gratification. Whether individuals with ARFID display a similar reduction in delay discounting as those with AN (vs. an opposing bias towards increased delay discounting or no bias) is important in informing transdiagnostic versus disorder-specific cognitive characteristics and optimizing future intervention strategies.
psychiatry,nutrition & dietetics,psychology, clinical