Sex and Equipment Impact on Lifting Velocity and the Maximum Repetitions in Bench Press

Alejandro Pérez-Castilla,Carlos Martínez-Rubio,Andrés Baena-Raya,David M. Díez-Fernández,Alba Hernández-Martínez,Manuel Antonio Rodríguez-Pérez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2339-2217
2024-06-27
International Journal of Sports Medicine
Abstract:This study investigated how equipment and sex affect the prediction accuracy of the maximum number of repetitions performed to failure (RTF) using the fastest mean velocity of the set (MV fastest ). Sixteen men and twelve women completed four sessions (two using free-weight equipment and two sessions using the Smith machine). Each session involved three sets of repetitions to failure against the 65%, 75%, and 85% of the one-repetition maximum, interspersed by 10-min of rest. The goodness-of-fit of the individualized RTF-MV fastest relationships was comparable between both equipment types and sexes ( P ≥0.510). Moreover, there were not significant differences in the MV fastest associated with RTF between equipment types ( P ≥0.258). However, the MV fastest associated with RTF was higher for men than for women in repetitions 6 to 15 ( P ≤0.043; ES≥0.69). In addition, the absolute errors when predicting RTF showed no significant differences between equipment types and loads ( P <0.444). Specifically, these RTF estimates were within an acceptable range for men (<2 repetitions), but not for women (≥2 repetitions) (main effect of sex: P ≤0.018; ES≥0.58). These findings suggest that individualized RTF-MV fastest equations estimate the RTF with an acceptable precision in men during bench press exercises in both equipment types but exhibit lower precision for women. Received: 24 February 2024 Accepted: 23 May 2024 Article published online: 26 June 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
sport sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?